Assessing Text Reading and Text Entry while Driving Using the Visual Occlusion Technique

· 2013 · Ghazizadeh M, Lee JD, Peng Y, Boyle LN

DOI: 10.17077/drivingassessment.1478

archive: archived pipeline: cataloged verified

Abstract

University of Iowa Iowa Research Online Driving Assessment Conference 2013 Driving Assessment Conference Jun 18th, 12:00 AM Assessing Text Reading and Text Entry while Driving Using the Visual Occlusion Technique Mahtab Ghazizadeh University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI John D Lee University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI Yiyun Peng University of Washington, Seattle, Washington Linda Ng Boyle University of Washington, Seattle, Washington Follow this and additional works at: https

Summary

HFES conference proceedings report (Aspire Conference) documenting N-back temporal instability findings. Two-experiment study showing N-back performance improvement and workload decrease over 26+ on-road driving sessions. Experiment 1: 10 participants with 26+ exposures show systematic accuracy increases and cognitive demand decreases. Experiment 2: Old vs New digit sequences tested with 20 participants; equivalent performance confirms strategy-based improvement.

Key finding

N-back accuracy and DRT-based workload measures show systematic drift over repeated on-road sessions, with improvements attributable to general strategy acquisition (subvocal rehearsal, automatization) rather than sequence-specific learning.

Methodology

Exp 1: 10 participants, repeated measures across 6 sessions from 26 total. Exp 2: 20 participants, Old/New sequence comparison. On-road driving paradigm with DRT and NASA-TLX measures.

Sample size: Exp 1: N=10; Exp 2: N=20

Quality score: 5 / 5