Risky Driving and Enforcement Legitimacy on Queensland Beaches: A Study of Offending and Legitimacy
DOI: 10.33492/jrs-d-25-1-2472594
archive: archived pipeline: cataloged verified
Get this paper ↗ (DOI — opens at the source; we link to it, we don't host it)
Summary
This study investigates the relationship between self-reported driving offences and perceptions of enforcement legitimacy among drivers on Queensland beaches. Motivated by the rising concern over serious injury and fatal crashes in beach environments, the research addresses a gap in literature regarding how driver behaviour differs between traditional roads and gazetted beach roads, where unique environmental challenges and dual enforcement by police and park rangers exist. The study aimed to contrast self-reported offending in these two settings and determine whether lower views of enforcement legitimacy correlated with higher rates of offending. The researchers employed a cross-sectional survey design, recruiting 702 participants through online, in-person, and traditional media channels in March 2024. Participants were Queensland drivers who had driven on specific beaches within the past five years. The survey collected demographic data, driving experience, and self-reported compliance with traffic laws, specifically focusing on speeding, drink driving, drug driving, and seatbelt use in both beach and road environments. Views of legitimacy regarding police and rangers were measured using adapted items assessing respect, honesty, and authority, categorized into high and low groups based on sample means. Data analysis utilized paired samples t-tests to compare offending behaviours across locations and chi-square tests to examine the relationship between legitimacy views and offending. Key findings revealed statistically significant differences in offending behaviours by location. Drivers reported higher rates of speeding and drink driving on roads compared to beaches. Specifically, low-range speeding was reported by 80.3% of drivers on roads versus 66.4% on beaches, and drink driving offending was 11.7% on roads compared to 6.4% on beaches. Conversely, seatbelt non-use was significantly higher on beaches (6.4%) than on roads (0.9%). No significant difference was found for drug driving between the two environments. Furthermore, chi-square analysis demonstrated a significant relationship between enforcement legitimacy and offending behaviour; higher views of the legitimacy of both police and rangers were significantly associated with lower offending rates. The study concludes that enforcement legitimacy plays a crucial role in promoting road rule compliance in beach environments. The findings suggest that enhancing public perception of police and ranger legitimacy through community policing strategies could improve safety outcomes. The results highlight the need for targeted enforcement and education efforts that address the unique challenges of beach driving, particularly regarding seatbelt compliance, while leveraging the established link between legitimacy and behavioural adherence to reduce crash risks.
Provenance
The full processing record for this entry. Every stage of this paper's journey through the pipeline is logged — what ran, with which tool and model, how many attempts it took, and when it last completed.
| Stage | Outcome | Tool | Model | Prompt | Attempts | Completed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| discover | success | Crossref | — | — | 1 | 2026-06-24 |
| archive | success | canonical_url | — | — | 1 | 2026-06-26 |
| extract | success | cached | — | — | 2 | 2026-06-26 |
| clean | success | clean | — | — | 1 | 2026-06-25 |
| chunk | success | chunk | — | — | 1 | 2026-06-25 |
| embed | success | embed | Qwen/Qwen3-Embedding-8B | — | 1 | 2026-06-25 |
| promote | success | — | — | — | 1 | 2026-06-24 |
| summarize | success | llm | qwen3.6-27b-prismaquant | summ-v5 | 1 | 2026-06-26 |
| tag | success | vector_similarity | — | — | 6 | 2026-06-25 |
| verify | success | — | — | — | 1 | 2026-06-26 |
Summary generated by qwen3.6-27b-prismaquant on 2026-06-26; verification: verified.
Topics
Ranked by relevance to this paper. Hover a topic for its definition.
Information type
What kind of knowledge this paper contributes, grouped by family — independent of topic (what it is about) and method (how it was studied).
- Empirical Findings: observational prevalence