Real-Time Implementation Comparison of Urban Eco-Driving Controls [Brief]

Bradley, Thomas · 2024 · ROSA P / Mountain-Plains Consortium

archive: archived pipeline: cataloged verified

Get this paper ↗ (full text — opens at the source; we link to it, we don't host it)

Summary

This research brief addresses the lack of comprehensive comparative analysis for autonomous eco-driving control strategies. Eco-driving aims to reduce fuel consumption by minimizing accelerations and unnecessary braking. While connected autonomous vehicle (CAV) technology offers a scalable solution by circumventing driver training and acceptance issues, the literature presents a diverse array of control methods without a unified evaluation of their real-time implementation capabilities. The study seeks to fill this gap by categorizing existing strategies and evaluating their effectiveness in terms of energy economy and computational load. The researchers conducted a literature review to categorize eco-driving controls into rule-based and optimal methods, with the latter further divided into globally and locally optimal approaches. They established a framework for comparing solver methods using real-world data, analyzing subsystems including perception, planning, and the plant subsystem. The experimental design involved comparing specific control methods, such as rule-based eco-driving, discretized control optimization, and polynomial trajectory optimization, to assess their performance in urban environments. The findings reveal a distinct trade-off between energy efficiency and computational feasibility. Globally optimal solutions, such as those derived from dynamic programming, provide the highest potential for energy economy improvement but are computationally expensive, limiting their real-time applicability. In contrast, genetic algorithms emerged as a promising real-time method, successfully balancing energy economy improvements with computational feasibility. The study highlights that while various methods exist, the choice of solver significantly impacts both the energy savings achieved and the processing resources required. The significance of this work lies in its recommendation for practical implementation in urban battery electric vehicles. The researchers conclude that autonomous eco-driving controls can significantly enhance vehicle energy economy, potentially yielding an 11% national impact on energy savings if widely adopted. Specifically, they recommend using a genetic algorithm method combined with a road power cost function as the optimal trade-off for generating eco-driving traces. This conclusion provides a clear direction for developers seeking to implement scalable, efficient autonomous driving strategies that maximize energy savings without prohibitive computational costs.

Key finding

A genetic-algorithm eco-driving controller with a road-power cost function gave the best trade-off between energy economy and computational feasibility, with autonomous eco-driving projected to deliver an 11 percent national energy savings if widely adopted.

Methodology

simulation_modeling

Provenance

The full processing record for this entry. Every stage of this paper's journey through the pipeline is logged — what ran, with which tool and model, how many attempts it took, and when it last completed. Discovered via bulk_ingest_rosap on 2026-05-23 (7 acquisition events logged).

StageOutcomeToolModelPromptAttemptsCompleted
discover success rosap 2 2026-05-23
archive success 1 2026-05-23
extract success cached 2 2026-06-10
clean success 1 2026-06-01
chunk success 1 2026-06-01
embed success 1 2026-06-02
enrich success 1 2026-05-23
promote success 1 2026-05-23
summarize success llm qwen3.6-27b-prismaquant summ-v5 3 2026-06-10
tag success vector_similarity 24 2026-06-11
verify success 3 2026-06-10

Summary generated by qwen3.6-27b-prismaquant on 2026-06-10; verification: verified.

Topics

Ranked by relevance to this paper. Hover a topic for its definition.

Information type

What kind of knowledge this paper contributes, grouped by family — independent of topic (what it is about) and method (how it was studied).