The Role of Driver Rehabilitation in Extending the Driving Lifetimes and Enhancing the Mobility of Older Adults

D'Ambrosio, Lisa · 2013 · ROSA P / New England University Transportation Center

archive: archived pipeline: cataloged verified

Get this paper ↗ (full text — opens at the source; we link to it, we don't host it)

Summary

This study investigates the role and impact of driver rehabilitation on extending the driving lifetimes and enhancing the mobility of older adults. Motivated by the increasing number of older drivers and the underutilization of driver rehabilitation services, the research aimed to understand how these interventions affect older adults’ ability to drive safely, their attitudes toward driving, and their overall mobility satisfaction. The authors note that while older driver education exists, it often fails to address individual physical or medical challenges, and many older adults avoid assessments due to fears of automatic license revation. The methodology employed a qualitative design with two stages of data collection. First, two focus groups were conducted with 15 occupational therapists (OTs) holding specialty certifications in driving and community mobility. These practitioners discussed their perspectives on comprehensive driving evaluations. Concurrently, 25 adults aged 50 and older who had received comprehensive driving evaluations were recruited via OT referrals for telephone interviews. These interviews explored participants’ experiences, expectations, and the impact of the evaluations on their driving skills and habits. Researchers independently reviewed transcripts to identify key themes. Findings from the OT focus groups revealed a lack of a single standardized model for comprehensive driving evaluations, with variations in tests and equipment used. However, there was universal agreement on the preference for physician referrals, primarily to ensure communication between healthcare providers and OTs rather than for insurance coverage. Evaluations were typically extensive, involving clinical assessments, driving tests, and feedback to patients and families. OTs emphasized that outcomes were complex, often involving recommendations for restrictions or additional training rather than simple pass/fail decisions. They viewed their role as reporting results to the DMV or physicians, not directly revoking licenses, and highlighted the importance of family involvement in the transition from driver to passenger. Among older adults, three key themes emerged. First, driving was deeply tied to feelings of independence and autonomy, making concerns about evaluation outcomes paramount. Second, all participants had medical reasons for their evaluations, often prompted by physicians, and many underwent rehabilitation or vehicle modification training. Third, many participants lacked clarity regarding the connection between clinical tests and driving behavior assessments, often underestimating the depth of the evaluation. The study concludes that there is a need for professional consensus and empirical data to establish valid and reliable links between clinical tests and driving performance. Additionally, the volunteer sample likely skewed results toward positive experiences, as all participants were still driving. The findings were disseminated through conference presentations and public education materials to inform older adults and families about comprehensive driving evaluations.

Key finding

Occupational therapists used no common set of clinical tests in comprehensive driving evaluations, with no professional consensus on which tests are essential to assess older adults' driving ability.

Methodology

other

Provenance

The full processing record for this entry. Every stage of this paper's journey through the pipeline is logged — what ran, with which tool and model, how many attempts it took, and when it last completed. Discovered via bulk_ingest_rosap on 2026-05-23 (8 acquisition events logged).

StageOutcomeToolModelPromptAttemptsCompleted
discover success rosap 2 2026-05-23
archive success 1 2026-05-23
extract success cached 2 2026-06-10
clean success 1 2026-06-01
chunk success 1 2026-06-01
embed success 1 2026-06-02
enrich success 1 2026-05-23
promote success 1 2026-05-23
summarize success llm qwen3.6-27b-prismaquant summ-v5 3 2026-06-10
tag success vector_similarity 19 2026-06-11
verify success 4 2026-06-10

Summary generated by qwen3.6-27b-prismaquant on 2026-06-10; verification: verified.

Topics

Ranked by relevance to this paper. Hover a topic for its definition.

Information type

What kind of knowledge this paper contributes, grouped by family — independent of topic (what it is about) and method (how it was studied).