Safe Mobility for Older People Notebook

Staplin, L. K.; Lococo, K. (Kathy); Stewart, Joseph; Decina, L. E. (Larry E.) · 1999 · ROSA P / United States. Department of Transportation. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

archive: archived pipeline: cataloged verified

Get this paper ↗ (full text — opens at the source; we link to it, we don't host it)

Summary

This document, titled *Safe Mobility for Older People Notebook*, is a research product of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration’s (NHTSA) "Model Driver Screening and Evaluation Program." Published in 1999, it addresses the public health challenge of age-related driving impairments, motivated by the rapid growth of the population over age 65 and the high vulnerability of older drivers to injury or death in crashes. The primary objective is to promote safe mobility by identifying high-risk older drivers, providing counseling and remediation, and offering alternative transportation options. The notebook serves as a comprehensive resource for state and provincial agencies, synthesizing current knowledge on screening, evaluation, and intervention strategies. The methodology involves a systematic review of existing research, implementation efforts, and data sources to develop a framework for a national model program. The document is organized into 70 subtopic discussions, each containing a summary of outcomes, preliminary recommendations, and references. It covers epidemiological links between medical conditions and crash risk, functional assessment techniques, and program components for regulation and counseling. A significant portion of the text is dedicated to an "Annotated Research Compendium" detailing specific driver assessment techniques for age-related functional impairments, including vision, attention, cognition, and physical capabilities. The authors emphasize a multi-tiered evaluation approach, ranging from initial functional screening to comprehensive diagnostic testing by professionals. Key findings highlight that specific medical diagnoses are less predictive of driving impairment than the functional limitations they cause. For instance, regarding dementia, the notebook notes that while crash rates for Alzheimer’s patients remain low in the first three years, risk increases significantly thereafter. Drivers with dementia often lack insight into their impairments, making self-regulation unlikely. Studies cited show that standardized road tests and cognitive assessments, such as the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), correlate with driving safety, with an MMSE score below 10 indicating a need for immediate cessation of driving. Regarding cataracts, research indicates that vision improvement through surgery can positively impact crash rates and driving habits. The document also details various identification procedures, including internal DMV mechanisms, external referrals from healthcare providers, and self-testing activities. The significance of this work lies in its provision of evidence-based guidelines for developing fair, accurate, and cost-effective driver screening programs. It concludes that functional screening should not be confined to Departments of Motor Vehicles but should include community-based settings and self-evaluation tools. The notebook advocates for a holistic approach that includes remediation, such as vehicle modifications and perceptual skills training, as well as mobility counseling to inform seniors about alternative transportation options. By integrating medical, functional, and social service perspectives, the document aims to preserve the independence and dignity of older adults while mitigating crash risks, offering a structured framework for jurisdictions to implement safe mobility initiatives.

Key finding

The document establishes that functional limitations, rather than mere medical diagnoses, are the primary predictors of driving impairment in older adults, necessitating a multi-tiered screening approach that combines cognitive, sensory, and physical assessments to accurately identify high-risk drivers.

Methodology

review

Provenance

The full processing record for this entry. Every stage of this paper's journey through the pipeline is logged — what ran, with which tool and model, how many attempts it took, and when it last completed. Discovered via bulk_ingest_rosap on 2026-05-23 (45 acquisition events logged).

Summary generated by qwen3.6-27b-prismaquant on 2026-06-10; verification: verified.

Topics

Ranked by relevance to this paper. Hover a topic for its definition.

• older driver retraining
• fitness to drive assessment
• mci dementia driving
• cognitive impairment
• older drivers
• age related perceptual decline

Information type

What kind of knowledge this paper contributes, grouped by family — independent of topic (what it is about) and method (how it was studied).

• Applied Guidance: countermeasure evaluation
• Methodological Resource: validation psychometrics
• Theoretical Contribution: computational model