Empirical Study of Effect of Dynamic Travel Time Information on Driver Route Choice Behavior

Wang, Jinghui; Rakha, Hesham · 2020 · OpenAlex-citations

DOI: 10.3390/s20113257

archive: archived pipeline: cataloged verified

Get this paper ↗ (DOI — opens at the source; we link to it, we don't host it)

Summary

This study investigates the impact of dynamic travel time information on day-to-day driver route choice behavior, addressing the limitations of traditional discrete choice models that assume rational utility maximization. Motivated by the need to improve Advanced Traveler Information Systems (ATIS) and capture realistic behavioral mechanisms, the research examines whether providing real-time information enhances rationality, how effects vary by individual and trip characteristics, and which information types are most effective. The study contrasts with prior literature that relied heavily on simulations or stated preferences, offering a real-world empirical analysis. The researchers conducted a real-world experiment involving 20 participants (aged 18–33 and 55–75) who drove five origin-destination pairs in Blacksburg and Christiansburg, Virginia, over 11 trials. Participants were provided with dynamically updated travel time information, including average travel time and travel time variability, derived from GPS data of previous trials. The experimental design compared these "with-information" trials against a baseline "without-information" group from a prior study by Tawfik and Rakha (2012). The study measured behavioral rationality using "logical choice rates" (choosing the faster route) and "inertial choice rates" (sticking to a habitual, slower route). Results indicate that historical travel time information enhanced behavioral rationality by an average of 10%, particularly during early trials when drivers had limited experience. Information reduced inertial tendencies, encouraging drivers to switch to faster routes despite potential risks. Expected travel time information proved more effective than variability information for inexperienced drivers, though this difference diminished as drivers gained cumulative experience. Initially, drivers preferred faster but less reliable routes; however, with increased experience, they shifted toward more reliable routes, becoming less risk-seeking. The study also highlighted significant heterogeneity in responses: while some participants became more rational with information, others remained inertial or prioritized non-time factors like scenery or intersection counts. Perception accuracy of travel time improved from 38% to 62% post-experiment. The findings imply that integrating information effects into route choice modeling can significantly improve the accuracy of ATIS design. The study demonstrates that information facilitates logical choices primarily when drivers lack prior knowledge, but its effectiveness is moderated by personal traits and trip characteristics. These insights support the development of personalized ATIS systems that account for individual behavioral patterns and learning processes, moving beyond the assumption of uniform rationality in transportation modeling.

Provenance

The full processing record for this entry. Every stage of this paper's journey through the pipeline is logged — what ran, with which tool and model, how many attempts it took, and when it last completed.

StageOutcomeToolModelPromptAttemptsCompleted
discover success OpenAlex-citations 1 2026-06-17
archive success openalex 5 2026-06-25
extract success cached 2 2026-06-26
clean success clean 1 2026-06-18
chunk success chunk 1 2026-06-18
embed success embed Qwen/Qwen3-Embedding-8B 1 2026-06-18
promote success 1 2026-06-17
summarize success llm qwen3.6-27b-prismaquant summ-v5 1 2026-06-26
tag success vector_similarity 6 2026-06-18
verify success 1 2026-06-26

Summary generated by qwen3.6-27b-prismaquant on 2026-06-26; verification: verified.

Topics

Ranked by relevance to this paper. Hover a topic for its definition.

Information type

What kind of knowledge this paper contributes, grouped by family — independent of topic (what it is about) and method (how it was studied).