Citizen Reporting of DUI-Extra Eyes to Identify Impaired Driving
archive: archived pipeline: cataloged verified
Get this paper ↗ (full text — opens at the source; we link to it, we don't host it)
Summary
This report evaluates "Operation Extra Eyes," a citizen reporting program implemented by the Montgomery County Police Department in Maryland to combat impaired driving. The study was motivated by the need to address officer burnout and resource constraints following the September 11 attacks and the 2002 Washington sniper incidents, which had strained law enforcement capabilities. While citizen reporting of drunk driving has existed for decades, it had not been rigorously evaluated as a standalone countermeasure. The program aimed to energize DUI enforcement by training community volunteers to identify impaired drivers and deploying them alongside police during saturation patrols, while student volunteers assisted with arrest paperwork. The evaluation, conducted by the Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation for the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, covered the period from December 2002 to December 2005. The methodology included 26 interviews with key informants (officers, volunteers, prosecutors, and media), surveys of 33 Montgomery County patrol officers, and analysis of administrative data. Researchers compared DUI arrest records and alcohol-related crash data in Montgomery County against neighboring Prince George’s and Anne Arundel counties, where the program was not implemented. Additionally, nearly 700 surveys of driver license applicants were conducted to assess public awareness and perceptions of enforcement. Findings indicated that participants viewed the program positively. Prosecutors and officers reported that the program motivated officers and improved community relations. Among participating officers, 91% reported making arrests or issuing citations attributable to Extra Eyes. Operationally, the program yielded consistent results, with at least one DUI arrest occurring on nearly every operational night. However, objective data did not show a significant reduction in impaired driving consequences. Overall alcohol-related arrests in Montgomery County declined between 2000 and 2003, a trend mirrored in comparison counties, suggesting the program did not drive a unique increase in arrests. Furthermore, time-series analysis revealed no significant change in the ratio of alcohol-related crashes in Montgomery County relative to the control counties. Public surveys showed no statistically significant difference in self-reported drinking and driving behaviors between counties, though Montgomery residents perceived enforcement to be stronger than three years prior. The study concludes that while Operation Extra Eyes successfully met its goals of motivating officers and bridging community-police relations, it did not demonstrably reduce impaired driving activity or crash rates. The authors attribute this lack of measurable impact on crash statistics to the program’s limited scale (occurring only 5–8 times per year in specific neighborhoods), the absence of a clear initiation point due to prior partial implementation, and a lack of concerted publicity efforts to enhance general deterrence. The report suggests that while the program is beneficial for officer morale and community engagement, its effectiveness as a standalone countermeasure for reducing impaired driving remains unproven without broader implementation and public awareness campaigns.
Key finding
Objective data showed no significant reduction in alcohol-related arrests or crash rates in Montgomery County relative to comparison areas, despite positive perceptions of the program by participants.
Methodology
mixed_methods
Sample size: 700
Provenance
The full processing record for this entry. Every stage of this paper's journey through the pipeline is logged — what ran, with which tool and model, how many attempts it took, and when it last completed. Discovered via bulk_ingest_rosap on 2026-05-23 (6 acquisition events logged).
| Stage | Outcome | Tool | Model | Prompt | Attempts | Completed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| discover | success | rosap | — | — | 2 | 2026-05-23 |
| archive | success | — | — | — | 1 | 2026-05-23 |
| extract | success | cached | — | — | 2 | 2026-06-10 |
| clean | success | — | — | — | 1 | 2026-06-01 |
| chunk | success | — | — | — | 1 | 2026-06-01 |
| embed | success | — | — | — | 1 | 2026-06-02 |
| enrich | success | — | — | — | 1 | 2026-05-23 |
| promote | success | — | — | — | 1 | 2026-05-23 |
| summarize | success | llm | qwen3.6-27b-prismaquant | summ-v5 | 3 | 2026-06-10 |
| tag | success | vector_similarity | — | — | 19 | 2026-06-11 |
| verify | success | — | — | — | 2 | 2026-06-10 |
Summary generated by qwen3.6-27b-prismaquant on 2026-06-10; verification: verified.
Topics
Ranked by relevance to this paper. Hover a topic for its definition.
Information type
What kind of knowledge this paper contributes, grouped by family — independent of topic (what it is about) and method (how it was studied).
- Applied Guidance: countermeasure evaluation