The impact of automation and connectivity on traffic flow and CO2 emissions. A detailed microsimulation study
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117399
archive: archived pipeline: cataloged verified
Get this paper ↗ (DOI — opens at the source; we link to it, we don't host it)
Summary
This study investigates the impact of vehicle automation and connectivity on traffic flow and CO2 emissions, addressing concerns that anticipated benefits of Connected and Automated Vehicles (CAVs) may be overstated due to limitations in existing simulation tools. The authors argue that standard microsimulation models often ignore realistic vehicle dynamics and instantaneous emissions, leading to inaccurate assessments. The research aims to determine whether different driving behaviors significantly affect emissions during rush hours and to evaluate the importance of simulating detailed vehicle dynamics. The researchers conducted a microsimulation study using Aimsun software on the ring road network of Antwerp, Belgium. They simulated eight scenarios involving three vehicle types: Conventional Vehicles (CVs), Automated Vehicles (AVs) without connectivity, and CAVs with Vehicle-to-Vehicle communication. To assess the impact of realistic dynamics, they coupled standard car-following models with the Microsimulation Free-flow aCceleration (MFC) model, which accounts for vehicle power potential and driver behavior. Emissions were estimated using two methods: the average-speed EMEP/EEA methodology and the instantaneous CO2MPAS model, which requires detailed vehicle dynamics data. Scenarios included baseline traffic and a 20% increased demand for CAVs to test network capacity. Results indicate that automation alone deteriorates network status, with AVs exhibiting conservative driving behaviors that reduce throughput and increase fuel consumption per kilometer compared to CVs. Connectivity is identified as the key factor for improving traffic flow, as CAVs maintain higher speeds and better network status. However, CAVs only marginally lower overall consumption compared to human-driven vehicles. Crucially, the choice of emissions model alters conclusions: while the EMEP/EEA model suggests CAVs produce fewer emissions than CVs, the more accurate CO2MPAS model reveals CAVs produce slightly more. Furthermore, simulating realistic vehicle dynamics amplifies the differences between vehicle types, showing that traditional models overestimate acceleration capabilities and underestimate emissions. The study concludes that accurate assessment of CAV impacts requires detailed simulation of vehicle dynamics and instantaneous emissions. It challenges the assumption that automation inherently reduces emissions, highlighting that connectivity is essential for traffic flow improvements. The findings suggest that policy and traffic management strategies must account for these nuanced effects, as the environmental benefits of CAVs are less significant than previously thought when realistic driving behaviors and vehicle physics are considered.
Provenance
The full processing record for this entry. Every stage of this paper's journey through the pipeline is logged — what ran, with which tool and model, how many attempts it took, and when it last completed.
| Stage | Outcome | Tool | Model | Prompt | Attempts | Completed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| discover | success | OpenAlex-citations | — | — | 1 | 2026-06-19 |
| archive | success | unpaywall | — | — | 2 | 2026-06-25 |
| extract | success | pdftotext | — | — | 2 | 2026-06-26 |
| clean | success | clean | — | — | 1 | 2026-06-26 |
| chunk | success | chunk | — | — | 1 | 2026-06-26 |
| embed | success | embed | Qwen/Qwen3-Embedding-8B | — | 1 | 2026-06-26 |
| enrich | success | semantic_scholar | — | — | 4 | 2026-06-26 |
| promote | success | — | — | — | 1 | 2026-06-19 |
| summarize | success | llm | qwen3.6-27b-prismaquant | summ-v5 | 1 | 2026-06-26 |
| tag | success | vector_similarity | — | — | 6 | 2026-06-26 |
| verify | success | — | — | — | 1 | 2026-06-26 |
Summary generated by qwen3.6-27b-prismaquant on 2026-06-26; verification: verified.
Topics
Ranked by relevance to this paper. Hover a topic for its definition.
Information type
What kind of knowledge this paper contributes, grouped by family — independent of topic (what it is about) and method (how it was studied).
- Theoretical Contribution: computational model