Court Procedures for Identifying Problem Drinkers. Volume 2, Supplemental Readings

Mudge, B.; Kerlan, M. W.; Post, D. V.; Mortimer, R. G. (Rudolf G.); Filkins, Lyle D. · 1971 · ROSA P / University of Michigan. Highway Safety Research Institute

archive: archived pipeline: cataloged verified

Get this paper ↗ (full text — opens at the source; we link to it, we don't host it)

Summary

This document, Volume 2 of a series prepared for the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, serves as a supplemental guide for court personnel implementing procedures to identify problem drinkers among Driving Under the Influence (DUIL) offenders. The primary motivation is the recognition that traditional legal sanctions, such as fines or jail time, are often inadequate for addressing the underlying alcohol abuse that drives recidivism. The authors argue that a significant majority of DUIL offenders are problem drinkers who require targeted intervention rather than mere punishment. The text aims to provide judges, court counselors, and probation officers with the philosophical rationale, interviewer qualifications, and scientific basis for a standardized identification procedure. The document outlines specific requirements for interviewers, emphasizing that while specialized clinical training is not mandatory, personnel must possess basic literacy, mathematical skills for scoring, and, most critically, empathy and the ability to establish rapport. It details the rationale for using a standardized questionnaire and interview, noting that standardization minimizes administrative error and allows for comparative research. The selection of questionnaire items is justified through empirical and eclectic methods, citing previous studies that demonstrate significant statistical differences between problem drinkers and the general driving population regarding variables such as marital status, smoking habits, financial stress, and family history of alcoholism. For instance, the text notes that individuals with multiple DUIL convictions are significantly more likely to be divorced, live alone, or report drinking to cope with personal problems compared to random driver samples. Furthermore, the paper addresses the philosophy of "constructive coercion," arguing that pressure from the court system to enter treatment is an effective mechanism for engaging offenders who might otherwise deny their problems. It asserts that initial reticence or pressure does not negatively impact treatment outcomes. The text also provides a detailed physiological overview of alcohol metabolism, explaining how ethanol is absorbed and processed, and clarifying that alcoholics do not metabolize alcohol differently than non-alcoholics but rather exhibit higher behavioral and gastrointestinal tolerance. This section serves to educate court personnel on the physical consequences of abuse, including the risks of withdrawal and the ineffectiveness of stimulants like coffee in reversing intoxication. The significance of this work lies in its effort to shift the judicial response to DUIL offenses from purely punitive to rehabilitative. By providing a scientifically grounded, standardized tool for identifying problem drinkers, the authors aim to facilitate early intervention and appropriate treatment referrals. The document concludes that addressing the root cause of excessive drinking is essential for preventing repeat offenses and fatal crashes, thereby reducing the broader social and economic costs associated with alcohol-related crime.

Key finding

The document establishes a standardized court-based identification procedure for problem drinkers using questionnaire items validated by statistical differences between drunk driving offenders and random driver samples, supported by physiological explanations of alcohol abuse.

Methodology

review

Provenance

The full processing record for this entry. Every stage of this paper's journey through the pipeline is logged — what ran, with which tool and model, how many attempts it took, and when it last completed. Discovered via bulk_ingest_rosap on 2026-05-23 (6 acquisition events logged).

Summary generated by qwen3.6-27b-prismaquant on 2026-06-10; verification: verified.

Topics

Ranked by relevance to this paper. Hover a topic for its definition.

• alcohol