Investigating the impact of dynamic merge control strategies on driving behavior on rural and urban expressways – A driving simulator study

Reinolsmann, Nora; Alhajyaseen, Wael; Brijs, Tom; Pirdavani, Ali; Hussain, Qinaat; Brijs, Kris · 2019 · Crossref

DOI: 10.1016/j.trf.2019.08.010

archive: archived pipeline: cataloged verified

Get this paper ↗ (DOI — opens at the source; we link to it, we don't host it)

Summary

This study investigates the effectiveness of dynamic versus static merge control strategies on driving behavior at expressway on-ramps, specifically addressing the safety risks associated with platoon merging. The research was motivated by the prevalence of harsh decelerations and abrupt lane changes by mainline drivers reacting to merging vehicles, which increases crash and congestion risks. While dynamic merge control (e.g., lane control signals and variable speed limits) is widely implemented, there was a lack of knowledge regarding which strategies are most effective for rural versus urban environments, particularly in the context of Qatar’s multicultural driver population and upcoming infrastructure demands. The researchers conducted a driving simulator study involving 66 licensed drivers from Qatar. Participants completed experimental drives on simulated urban (80 km/h speed limit) and rural (100 km/h speed limit) segments of the Doha Expressway. The study compared static merge control (standard warning signs and road markings) against dynamic merge control strategies, including lane control signals with and without variable speed limits (VSL). Data on mean speed, longitudinal acceleration/deceleration, lateral position, and cooperative lane changes were recorded as participants approached merging sections with platoon vehicles. Statistical analysis utilized within-subject repeated measures ANOVA to assess behavioral responses across the different conditions. The results indicated that dynamic merge control was significantly more effective on rural expressways. On rural segments, dynamic controls prompted earlier lane changes and gradual speed reductions, leading to smoother maneuvers and improved safety compared to static controls, which resulted in abrupt decelerations closer to the merge point. Conversely, on urban expressways, dynamic merge control did not provide additional safety benefits over static controls; driving behaviors were similar across conditions, suggesting that low-cost static measures are sufficient in urban settings. The study found that the higher traffic speeds characteristic of rural environments necessitate the advanced warning and speed management provided by dynamic systems to facilitate cooperative lane changes. The significance of this research lies in its recommendation for context-specific implementation of merge control strategies. Policymakers are advised to consider local speed characteristics when selecting traffic management tools. Dynamic merge control is justified for rural expressways to mitigate high-speed conflicts, whereas static merge control is adequate and cost-effective for urban expressways. This distinction helps optimize traffic safety and infrastructure investment by aligning control measures with the specific operational demands of different road environments.

Provenance

The full processing record for this entry. Every stage of this paper's journey through the pipeline is logged — what ran, with which tool and model, how many attempts it took, and when it last completed.

StageOutcomeToolModelPromptAttemptsCompleted
discover success Crossref 1 2026-06-07
archive success canonical_url 7 2026-06-09
extract success cached 2 2026-06-10
clean success clean 1 2026-06-09
chunk success chunk 1 2026-06-09
embed success embed Qwen/Qwen3-Embedding-8B 1 2026-06-09
enrich success semantic_scholar 1 2026-06-10
promote success 1 2026-06-07
summarize success llm qwen3.6-27b-prismaquant summ-v5 1 2026-06-10
tag success vector_similarity 8 2026-06-11
verify success 1 2026-06-10

Summary generated by qwen3.6-27b-prismaquant on 2026-06-10; verification: verified.

Topics

Ranked by relevance to this paper. Hover a topic for its definition.

Information type

What kind of knowledge this paper contributes, grouped by family — independent of topic (what it is about) and method (how it was studied).