Comparison between Auditory and Visual Simple Reaction Times
archive: archived pipeline: cataloged verified
Get this paper ↗ (DOI — opens at the source; we link to it, we don't host it)
Summary
This study investigates whether simple reaction times (RT) are faster for auditory or visual stimuli and identifies factors influencing athletic performance. Reaction time is defined as the interval between a sensory stimulus and the subsequent behavioral response, serving as a key indicator of neuromuscular coordination. While previous research presents conflicting findings regarding which modality yields faster responses, this work aims to clarify these differences and examine gender-based variations in performance. The methodology involved 14 subjects randomly assigned to groups of two. Each participant completed both visual and auditory reaction time tests using the DirectRT software program on a laptop. For the visual test, subjects pressed the spacebar upon seeing a yellow box on the screen. For the auditory test, they pressed the spacebar upon hearing a beep. Data analysis involved calculating the mean reaction time for each subject, excluding the first and last recorded values to mitigate anticipation or fatigue effects. The results demonstrated that auditory reaction times were significantly faster than visual reaction times. The mean visual reaction time was approximately 331 milliseconds, whereas the mean auditory reaction time was approximately 284 milliseconds. Additionally, the study found that male subjects exhibited faster reaction times than female subjects for both auditory and visual stimuli. These findings align with previous research by Pain & Hibbs and Thompson et al., which also reported faster auditory responses. The authors attribute the faster auditory reaction times to physiological differences in neural processing. Auditory stimuli reportedly reach the brain in 8–10 milliseconds, while visual stimuli take 20–40 milliseconds. Consequently, the auditory signal reaches the motor cortex more quickly, allowing for faster processing and muscle contraction. The gender difference in reaction times is attributed to greater muscular strength in males, which facilitates faster motor responses despite similar neural transmission times. The study concludes that auditory stimuli offer advantages for improving athletic performance due to faster conduction and processing times. It suggests that training programs should incorporate repeated exposure to auditory stimuli with adequate rest periods to enhance reaction speeds and overall athlete performance.
Provenance
The full processing record for this entry. Every stage of this paper's journey through the pipeline is logged — what ran, with which tool and model, how many attempts it took, and when it last completed.
| Stage | Outcome | Tool | Model | Prompt | Attempts | Completed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| discover | success | OpenAlex-citations | — | — | 1 | 2026-06-19 |
| archive | success | unpaywall | — | — | 2 | 2026-06-26 |
| extract | success | cached | — | — | 2 | 2026-06-26 |
| clean | success | clean | — | — | 1 | 2026-06-20 |
| chunk | success | chunk | — | — | 1 | 2026-06-20 |
| embed | success | embed | Qwen/Qwen3-Embedding-8B | — | 1 | 2026-06-20 |
| promote | success | — | — | — | 1 | 2026-06-19 |
| summarize | success | llm | qwen3.6-27b-prismaquant | summ-v5 | 1 | 2026-06-26 |
| tag | success | vector_similarity | — | — | 6 | 2026-06-20 |
| verify | success | — | — | — | 1 | 2026-06-26 |
Summary generated by qwen3.6-27b-prismaquant on 2026-06-26; verification: verified.
Topics
Ranked by relevance to this paper. Hover a topic for its definition.