Using GPS for Measuring Household Travel in Private Vehicles

Wagner, David P.; Murakami, Elaine; Guindon, Marc · 1997 · ROSA P / National Research Council (U.S.)

archive: archived pipeline: cataloged verified

Get this paper ↗ (full text — opens at the source; we link to it, we don't host it)

Summary

This paper addresses the limitations of traditional self-reported household travel surveys, which rely on written diaries and telephone retrieval. These conventional methods suffer from poor data quality regarding trip start/end times, destination locations, and short-trip reporting, while imposing a significant burden on respondents, often requiring over 20 minutes per person for a single day’s recall. To mitigate these issues, the authors developed a proof-of-concept system combining Global Positioning System (GPS) technology with Personal Digital Assistants (PDAs) to automatically capture vehicle-based travel data, aiming to improve data accuracy and reduce respondent effort. The study employed a field test conducted in Lexington, Kentucky, from September to December 1996, involving 100 households. The data collection unit consisted of a Sony MagicLink 2000 PDA connected to a Garmin GPS receiver, powered via the vehicle’s cigarette lighter. Drivers used a touch-screen interface to input trip purpose and occupancy, while the device automatically recorded date, time, and position at frequent intervals. After a six-day usage period, units were mailed back for processing using Geographic Information Systems (GIS) to calculate travel speed, distance, and route classification. The study also included post-usage telephone interviews to assess ease of use, privacy concerns, and to collect recall data for comparison with machine-recorded metrics. Results indicated high user acceptance, with over 70% of respondents rating the device as “very easy” to use and nearly all preferring it over written logs. Data analysis revealed that machine-recorded trip start times were evenly distributed, eliminating the rounding errors common in self-reported data, which typically showed peaks at quarter-hour intervals. The Lexington sample averaged 4.7 trips per day with an average trip length of 6 miles. While the technology successfully captured precise route choices, travel speeds, and functional road classifications—data previously difficult to obtain via telephone surveys—it did not fully eliminate unreported trips, as the device required manual activation. Privacy concerns were minimal, though some respondents expressed anxiety about vehicle theft. The study concludes that integrating GPS with handheld computers is a functional and effective method for household travel surveys. This approach significantly enhances data quality by providing objective measures of time, distance, and route choice, while reducing the cognitive and temporal burden on participants. Although GPS signals may be obscured in urban canyons or dense tree cover, the technology proved sufficient for plotting most trips without differential correction. The authors suggest that future iterations could automate device activation to further reduce missing data, positioning this hybrid method as a superior alternative to traditional diary-based surveys for transportation planning and policy analysis.

Key finding

GPS-recorded trip start times were evenly distributed across hours, whereas self-reported times exhibited significant rounding peaks at quarter-hour and five-minute intervals.

Methodology

field_study

Sample size: 100

Provenance

The full processing record for this entry. Every stage of this paper's journey through the pipeline is logged — what ran, with which tool and model, how many attempts it took, and when it last completed. Discovered via bulk_ingest_rosap on 2026-05-23 (6 acquisition events logged).

StageOutcomeToolModelPromptAttemptsCompleted
discover success rosap 2 2026-05-23
archive success 1 2026-05-23
extract success cached 2 2026-06-10
clean success 1 2026-06-01
chunk success 1 2026-06-01
embed success 1 2026-06-02
enrich success 1 2026-05-23
promote success 1 2026-05-23
summarize success llm qwen3.6-27b-prismaquant summ-v5 3 2026-06-10
tag success vector_similarity 19 2026-06-11
verify success 2 2026-06-10

Summary generated by qwen3.6-27b-prismaquant on 2026-06-10; verification: verified.

Topics

Ranked by relevance to this paper. Hover a topic for its definition.

Information type

What kind of knowledge this paper contributes, grouped by family — independent of topic (what it is about) and method (how it was studied).