Inter-trial inhibition in efficient and inefficient visual searches
DOI: 10.4992/pacjpa.74.0_2ev057
archive: archived pipeline: cataloged verified
Get this paper ↗ (DOI — opens at the source; we link to it, we don't host it)
Summary
This study investigates the phenomenon of inter-trial inhibition in visual search tasks, specifically comparing its effects in efficient versus inefficient search conditions. The research addresses how inhibitory tagging of previously searched stimuli influences reaction times when those stimuli are repeated across trials. The author examines whether this inhibitory effect accumulates over repetitions and how it differs based on the difficulty of the search task. The experimental design involved participants performing visual search tasks under two conditions: efficient search and inefficient search. In the efficient search task, participants searched for a target defined by a unique feature among distractors. In the inefficient search task, the target was defined by a conjunction of features, requiring serial attention. The study manipulated the repetition of search configurations, presenting either a new configuration or a repeated configuration from previous trials. Reaction times were measured as the primary dependent variable. The analysis focused on the interaction between search type (efficient vs. inefficient) and the number of repetitions of the same configuration. Statistical analyses included ANOVA to determine significant differences in reaction times across conditions and repetition levels. The results demonstrated significant inter-trial inhibition in both efficient and inefficient search tasks. In the efficient search condition, reaction times increased significantly with the number of repetitions of the same configuration, indicating cumulative inhibition. The statistical analysis revealed a significant main effect of repetition (F [4, 96] = 8.5, p < .001) and a significant interaction between search type and repetition (F [4, 96] = 3.5, p < .01). Specifically, the inhibitory effect was more pronounced in inefficient searches, where the cost of repeating a configuration was approximately 30ms, compared to about 7ms in efficient searches. This suggests that while inter-trial inhibition occurs in both types of search, it is stronger and more impactful in tasks that require more attentional resources. The findings imply that inter-trial inhibition is a robust mechanism in visual search that operates regardless of search efficiency but varies in magnitude. The greater inhibition in inefficient searches suggests that the cognitive cost of suppressing previously attended stimuli is higher when search demands are greater. This contributes to the understanding of attentional control mechanisms, highlighting that inhibitory tagging is not merely a byproduct of efficient search but a general feature of visual attention that scales with task difficulty. The study supports the view that inhibition plays a crucial role in managing attentional resources during repeated visual search tasks.
Provenance
The full processing record for this entry. Every stage of this paper's journey through the pipeline is logged — what ran, with which tool and model, how many attempts it took, and when it last completed.
| Stage | Outcome | Tool | Model | Prompt | Attempts | Completed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| discover | success | Crossref | — | — | 1 | 2026-06-11 |
| archive | success | canonical_url | — | — | 1 | 2026-06-25 |
| extract | success | pdftotext | — | — | 2 | 2026-06-26 |
| clean | success | clean | — | — | 1 | 2026-06-26 |
| chunk | success | chunk | — | — | 1 | 2026-06-26 |
| embed | success | embed | Qwen/Qwen3-Embedding-8B | — | 1 | 2026-06-26 |
| enrich | success | semantic_scholar | — | — | 5 | 2026-07-05 |
| promote | success | — | — | — | 1 | 2026-06-11 |
| summarize | success | llm | qwen3.6-27b-prismaquant | summ-v5 | 1 | 2026-06-25 |
| tag | success | vector_similarity | — | — | 6 | 2026-06-26 |
| verify | success | — | — | — | 1 | 2026-06-26 |
Summary generated by qwen3.6-27b-prismaquant on 2026-06-25; verification: verified.
Topics
Ranked by relevance to this paper. Hover a topic for its definition.