Development and Evaluation of a Comprehensive Program to Reduce Drinking and Impaired Driving among College Students
archive: archived pipeline: cataloged verified
Get this paper ↗ (full text — opens at the source; we link to it, we don't host it)
Summary
This study addresses the prevalence of alcohol consumption and impaired driving among college students, motivated by the high rates of alcohol-related injuries, crashes, and social problems on university campuses. The research highlights a critical measurement issue: self-reported drinking data often inaccurately reflects actual impairment levels. To correct this, the project aimed to develop and evaluate a comprehensive intervention program at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (UNC-CH) that utilized objective blood alcohol concentration (BAC) data to correct student misperceptions about campus drinking norms. The methodology employed a unique nighttime survey design to establish a baseline and evaluate the intervention. In the fall of 1997, researchers collected breath samples and conducted brief interviews with 1,786 randomly selected students returning to their residences between 10 p.m. and 3 a.m. This approach provided direct BAC measurements rather than relying solely on self-reports. Based on the finding that 65% of students returned home with a 0.00 BAC even on party nights, the researchers developed a social norms intervention called the "2 out of 3" program. This campaign delivered the message that "2 out of 3 UNC students return home with a .00 BAC" through orientation sessions, poster and sticker incentive campaigns, newspaper advertisements, and a website. The program was evaluated by repeating the BAC survey in the fall of 1999 with a sample of 2,535 students, assessing both alcohol use and awareness of the campaign. The results indicated high awareness and understanding of the intervention. Seventy-one percent of all students and 92% of first-year students were aware of the program, with 70% of those aware correctly understanding that drinking was less common than typically believed. Although 54% of students remained skeptical of the message, the objective data showed a statistically significant decline in heavy drinking. The proportion of students with a BAC above 0.08 dropped from 10.7% in 1997 to 8.3% in 1999, representing a 22% reduction. Additionally, alcohol-related student incidents reported to university authorities declined during the program period. Notably, while objective BAC measures showed improvement, self-reported drinking behaviors did not change significantly between the two survey periods. The significance of this study lies in its demonstration that using objective BAC data to inform social norms campaigns can effectively reduce heavy drinking and alcohol-related incidents on college campuses. The findings suggest that students often overestimate peer drinking, and correcting this misperception with concrete, campus-specific data can alter behavior. The study concludes that while self-report surveys are insufficient for capturing impairment levels, integrating direct BAC measurement into prevention programs provides a more accurate baseline and a more compelling message for students. Sustained efforts are recommended to further address skepticism and maintain the reduction in alcohol-related risks.
Key finding
The proportion of students with a BAC above .08 declined from 10.7% to 8.3%, representing a statistically significant 22% reduction, while student incidents involving alcohol also decreased.
Methodology
naturalistic
Sample size: 2535
Provenance
The full processing record for this entry. Every stage of this paper's journey through the pipeline is logged — what ran, with which tool and model, how many attempts it took, and when it last completed. Discovered via bulk_ingest_rosap on 2026-05-23 (6 acquisition events logged).
| Stage | Outcome | Tool | Model | Prompt | Attempts | Completed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| discover | success | rosap | — | — | 2 | 2026-05-23 |
| archive | success | — | — | — | 1 | 2026-05-23 |
| extract | success | cached | — | — | 2 | 2026-06-10 |
| clean | success | — | — | — | 1 | 2026-06-01 |
| chunk | success | — | — | — | 1 | 2026-06-01 |
| embed | success | — | — | — | 1 | 2026-06-02 |
| enrich | success | — | — | — | 1 | 2026-05-23 |
| promote | success | — | — | — | 1 | 2026-05-23 |
| summarize | success | llm | qwen3.6-27b-prismaquant | summ-v5 | 3 | 2026-06-10 |
| tag | success | vector_similarity | — | — | 24 | 2026-06-11 |
| verify | success | — | — | — | 2 | 2026-06-10 |
Summary generated by qwen3.6-27b-prismaquant on 2026-06-10; verification: verified.
Topics
Ranked by relevance to this paper. Hover a topic for its definition.
Information type
What kind of knowledge this paper contributes, grouped by family — independent of topic (what it is about) and method (how it was studied).
- Applied Guidance: countermeasure evaluation