Safety belt and motorcycle helmet use in Virginia : the 2001 update.

Jernigan, Jack D; Lynn, Cheryl · 2001 · ROSA P / Virginia Transportation Research Council (VTRC)

archive: archived pipeline: cataloged verified

Get this paper ↗ (full text — opens at the source; we link to it, we don't host it)

Summary

This report presents the findings of the 2001 statewide survey on safety belt and motorcycle helmet use in Virginia, conducted by the Virginia Transportation Research Council. The study was initiated to comply with federal guidelines established under Section 153 of the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 and its successor, Section 157, which required states to demonstrate compliance with mandatory usage laws to qualify for incentive funds. Although the original funding program ended in 1994, the Virginia Department of Motor Vehicles requested continued data collection using identical methodologies to maintain longitudinal comparability from 1992 through 2001. The methodology adhered to National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) standards for probability-based observational surveys. The sampling frame included all Virginia counties and independent cities except those comprising the smallest 15% of the state’s population. A stratified random sample of 120 sites was selected, with 84 sites in urban areas and 36 in rural areas, proportional to population distribution. Observers collected direct observational data for one hour at each site during daylight hours across all days of the week. Data were gathered for passenger cars (including vans, SUVs, and pickup trucks) in the curb lane and for motorcycles in all lanes. Observations of car occupants were weighted by the number of travel lanes to estimate total usage, while motorcycle observations were not weighted. The 2001 survey results indicate that Virginia’s statewide safety belt use rate for passenger car drivers and right-front passengers was 72.3%, with a relative error of 1.33%. This represents an increase from the 69.9% rate recorded in 2000. Over the ten-year study period (1992–2001), safety belt use rates fluctuated between a low of 67.1% in 1997 and a high of 73.6% in 1998. In contrast, motorcycle helmet use remained consistently high, reaching 100% in 2001. Across all ten years of the survey, virtually all observed motorcycle drivers and passengers were wearing helmets, with rates ranging from 98.7% to 100%. The study observed 37,393 weighted car occupants and 387 motorcycle occupants in 2001. The findings demonstrate sustained high compliance with motorcycle helmet laws in Virginia, while safety belt usage showed modest improvement in 2001 but remained below the federal goal of 85% established in 1997. The report confirms that Virginia’s survey methodology meets federal standards for calculating population-weighted usage rates, providing reliable longitudinal data for transportation safety policy and enforcement evaluation.

Key finding

The 2001 safety belt use rate in Virginia was 72.3%, while motorcycle helmet use was 100%.

Methodology

on_road

Sample size: 16961

Provenance

The full processing record for this entry. Every stage of this paper's journey through the pipeline is logged — what ran, with which tool and model, how many attempts it took, and when it last completed. Discovered via bulk_ingest_rosap on 2026-05-23 (6 acquisition events logged).

StageOutcomeToolModelPromptAttemptsCompleted
discover success rosap 2 2026-05-23
archive success 1 2026-05-23
extract success cached 2 2026-06-10
clean success 1 2026-06-01
chunk success 1 2026-06-01
embed success 1 2026-06-02
enrich skipped 3 2026-07-02
promote success 1 2026-05-23
summarize success llm qwen3.6-27b-prismaquant summ-v5 3 2026-06-10
tag success vector_similarity 24 2026-06-11
verify success 2 2026-06-10

Summary generated by qwen3.6-27b-prismaquant on 2026-06-10; verification: verified.

Topics

Ranked by relevance to this paper. Hover a topic for its definition.

Information type

What kind of knowledge this paper contributes, grouped by family — independent of topic (what it is about) and method (how it was studied).