Safety belt and motorcycle helmet use in Virginia : the Summer 2006 update.
archive: archived pipeline: cataloged verified
Get this paper ↗ (full text — opens at the source; we link to it, we don't host it)
Summary
This report presents the findings of the Summer 2006 statewide survey on safety belt and motorcycle helmet use in Virginia, conducted by the Virginia Transportation Research Council (VTRC) for the Virginia Department of Motor Vehicles. The study aims to track the effectiveness of programmatic efforts to increase restraint usage and to provide data required by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) for federal incentive grant allocations. The research is motivated by the proven benefits of safety restraints, which reduce the risk of death for front-seat occupants by 45 percent and serious injury by 50 percent, while also lowering inpatient hospital care costs. The methodology adhered to NHTSA’s probability-based sampling guidelines, utilizing direct observational data collected at 140 sites across Virginia. These sites were stratified to reflect the state’s urban and rural population distribution, with 85 sites in metropolitan areas and 55 in rural areas. Data collectors observed traffic at randomly selected intersections during one-hour intervals throughout June 2006. The survey focused on drivers and right-front outboard passengers aged 16 and older in passenger motor vehicles, as well as motorcycle drivers and passengers. Observations were weighted by the number of traffic lanes to estimate statewide usage rates, and rigorous training protocols ensured inter-collector reliability. The results indicated a statewide safety belt use rate of 78.7 percent for passenger vehicle occupants, based on 26,714 weighted observations. This represents a 1.7 percent decrease from the summer 2005 rate of 80.4 percent, which had been the highest recorded since the adoption of the current protocol in 1992. Conversely, the motorcycle helmet use rate remained exceptionally high at 99.1 percent, based on 507 observations. Historical data from 1992 to 2005 showed safety belt use fluctuating between a low of 67.1 percent in 1997 and the 2005 peak. The relative error for the 2006 safety belt estimate was 1.27 percent, while the helmet use estimate had a relative error of 0.11 percent. The report concludes that while helmet compliance in Virginia is near universal, safety belt usage has plateaued and slightly declined from recent highs. The authors caution that annual variations in use rates may be influenced by extraneous variables, such as changes in travel patterns or economic factors like gas prices, rather than solely reflecting changes in driver behavior. The data confirms that Virginia’s survey methods meet federal criteria for accuracy and representativeness, supporting the state’s eligibility for federal safety incentive grants.
Key finding
The summer 2006 safety belt use rate in Virginia was 78.7 percent, while the motorcycle helmet use rate was 99.1 percent.
Methodology
on_road
Sample size: 27221
Provenance
The full processing record for this entry. Every stage of this paper's journey through the pipeline is logged — what ran, with which tool and model, how many attempts it took, and when it last completed. Discovered via bulk_ingest_rosap on 2026-05-23 (6 acquisition events logged).
| Stage | Outcome | Tool | Model | Prompt | Attempts | Completed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| discover | success | rosap | — | — | 2 | 2026-05-23 |
| archive | success | — | — | — | 1 | 2026-05-23 |
| extract | success | cached | — | — | 2 | 2026-06-10 |
| clean | success | — | — | — | 1 | 2026-06-01 |
| chunk | success | — | — | — | 1 | 2026-06-01 |
| embed | success | — | — | — | 1 | 2026-06-02 |
| enrich | success | — | — | — | 1 | 2026-05-23 |
| promote | success | — | — | — | 1 | 2026-05-23 |
| summarize | success | llm | qwen3.6-27b-prismaquant | summ-v5 | 3 | 2026-06-10 |
| tag | success | vector_similarity | — | — | 24 | 2026-06-11 |
| verify | success | — | — | — | 2 | 2026-06-10 |
Summary generated by qwen3.6-27b-prismaquant on 2026-06-10; verification: verified.
Topics
Ranked by relevance to this paper. Hover a topic for its definition.
Information type
What kind of knowledge this paper contributes, grouped by family — independent of topic (what it is about) and method (how it was studied).
- Empirical Findings: observational prevalence, crash risk outcomes