Correction: Trial-by-trial feedback fails to improve the consideration of acceleration in visual time-to-collision estimation

Wessels, Marlene; Hecht, Heiko; Huisman, Thirsa; Oberfeld, Daniel · 2024 · Crossref

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0315441

archive: archived pipeline: cataloged verified

Get this paper ↗ (DOI — opens at the source; we link to it, we don't host it)

Summary

This document is a correction notice published in PLOS ONE in December 2024, addressing errors in the author contributions section of a previously published study. The original article, titled "Trial-by-trial feedback fails to improve the consideration of acceleration in visual time-to-collision estimation," was authored by Marlene Wessels, Heiko Hecht, Thirsa Huisman, and Daniel Oberfeld and was initially published in PLOS ONE in 2023 (Volume 18, Issue 8, Article e0288206). The correction does not alter the scientific findings, methods, or conclusions of the original research but serves to rectify the attribution of specific roles played by each author during the study's development and execution. The corrected author contributions are explicitly detailed as follows: Conceptualization of the study was a collaborative effort involving all four authors: Marlene Wessels, Heiko Hecht, Thirsa Huisman, and Daniel Oberfeld. The formal analysis of the data was conducted by Marlene Wessels and Daniel Oberfeld. Funding acquisition was solely managed by Daniel Oberfeld. The investigation phase, which likely involved the execution of the experimental procedures, was carried out by Marlene Wessels. Visualization of the results was handled by Marlene Wessels. The writing process was divided into two stages: the original draft was written by Marlene Wessels and Daniel Oberfeld, while the review and editing of the manuscript were performed by all four authors—Marlene Wessels, Heiko Hecht, Thirsa Huisman, and Daniel Oberfeld. The significance of this document lies in its adherence to academic integrity standards regarding authorship transparency. By correcting the record, the authors ensure that credit for specific intellectual and logistical contributions is accurately assigned. This correction is essential for proper attribution in academic databases and for future citations of the work. The notice references the original publication via its DOI (https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0288206) and PMID (37531322), linking the correction directly to the source material. The correction itself is published under the Creative Commons Attribution License, allowing for unrestricted use and distribution provided the original authors and source are credited. No changes to the scientific content, such as the study's conclusion that trial-by-trial feedback does not improve the consideration of acceleration in visual time-to-collision estimation, are indicated in this notice. The document serves purely as an administrative update to the metadata of the original research article.

Provenance

The full processing record for this entry. Every stage of this paper's journey through the pipeline is logged — what ran, with which tool and model, how many attempts it took, and when it last completed.

Summary generated by qwen3.6-27b-nvidia on 2026-08-07; verification: verified.

Topics

Ranked by relevance to this paper. Hover a topic for its definition.

• time to collision looming
• perception action locomotion