Detection and Prediction of Driver Drowsiness for the Prevention of Road Accidents Using Deep Neural Networks Techniques
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-33-6893-4_6
archive: archived pipeline: cataloged
Get this paper ↗ (DOI — opens at the source; we link to it, we don't host it)
Abstract
the day compared with other adults who did not report these characteristics. Drivers should avoid driving while drowsy and learn the warning signs of drowsy driving. BRFSS is a state-based, random-digit–dialed telephone survey of noninstitutionalized adults aged ≥18 years that is administered by state health departments each year in collaboration with CDC. Based on Council of American Survey and Research Organizations (CASRO) guidelines, response rates† for the states that used the optional sleep questions during * Arkansas (2010), California (2009, 2010), Connecticut (2010), Delaware (2010), Georgia (2009), Hawaii (2009, 2010), Illinois (2009), Kansas (2009, 2010), Louisiana (2009), Maryland (2009, 2010), Michigan (2010), Minnesota (2009, 2010), Missouri (2010), Nebraska (2009, 2010), Nevada (2010), New York (2009), Oregon (2010), Texas (2009), and Wyoming (2009). DC used the module in 2010. † The percentage of persons who completed interviews among all eligible persons, including those potential respondents for whom eligibility was not established. 2009–2010 had a median of 52.1% and ranged from 39.1% (Oregon in 2010) to 68.8% (Nebraska in 2010). Respondents were asked, “During the past 30 days, have you ever nodded off or fallen asleep, even just for a brief moment, while driving?” Drowsy driving was defined as those with an affirmative response, whereas no drowsy driving included those who responded “no,” “don’t drive,” “don’t have a license,” or “don’t know/not sure.” Respondents also were asked, “On average, how many hours of sleep do you get in a 24-hour period?” “Do you snore?” “During the past 30 days, for about how many days have you felt you did not get enough rest or sleep?” and “During the past 30 days, for about how many days did you find yourself unintentionally falling asleep during the day?” Age-adjusted prevalence of falling asleep while driving and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated by state, and by selected sociodemographic and other sleeprelated characteristics. For comparisons of prevalence between subgroups, statistical significance (p<0.05) was determined by using t-tests. All indicated differences between subgroups are statistically significant. INSIDE 1038 Cervical Cancer Screening Among Women Aged 18–30 Years — United States, 2000–2010 1043 Cervical Cancer Screening Among Women by Hysterectomy Status and Among Women Aged ≥65 Years — United States, 2000–2010 1048 Notes from the Field: Serogroup C Invasive Meningococcal Disease Among Men Who Have Sex With Men — New York City, 2010–2012 1049 Announcement 1050 QuickStats Continuing Education examination available at http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/cme/conted_info.html#weekly. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report
Provenance
The full processing record for this entry. Every stage of this paper's journey through the pipeline is logged — what ran, with which tool and model, how many attempts it took, and when it last completed.
| Stage | Outcome | Tool | Model | Prompt | Attempts | Completed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| discover | success | Crossref | — | — | 1 | 2026-06-24 |
| archive | success | canonical_url | — | — | 1 | 2026-06-26 |
| extract | success | pdftotext | — | — | 2 | 2026-06-26 |
| clean | success | clean | — | — | 1 | 2026-06-26 |
| chunk | success | chunk | — | — | 1 | 2026-06-26 |
| embed | success | embed | Qwen/Qwen3-Embedding-8B | — | 1 | 2026-06-26 |
| enrich | failed | — | — | — | 1 | 2026-06-26 |
| promote | success | — | — | — | 1 | 2026-06-24 |
| summarize | skipped | llm | qwen3.6-27b-prismaquant | summ-v5 | 1 | 2026-06-26 |
| tag | success | vector_similarity | — | — | 6 | 2026-06-26 |
Topics
Ranked by relevance to this paper. Hover a topic for its definition.
Information type
What kind of knowledge this paper contributes, grouped by family — independent of topic (what it is about) and method (how it was studied).
- Empirical Findings: observational prevalence