Effect of fNIRS on Physiological Index and Performance Under Vibratory Stimulus

Sugimoto, Junya; Hagiwara, Hiroshi · 2019 · Crossref

DOI: 10.54941/ahfe100217

archive: archived pipeline: cataloged

Get this paper ↗ (DOI — opens at the source; we link to it, we don't host it)

Summary

This study investigates whether vibratory stimulation can mitigate human error in monotonous tasks, a key factor in traffic accidents caused by fatigue. The authors hypothesized that 200 Hz vibratory stimuli, which target Pacinian receptors, could enhance performance and alter physiological states during driving-like activities. To test this, ten healthy right-handed participants performed two tasks: a monotonous Tracking task (tracking a moving target with a mouse) and a cognitive Stroop test (matching word meaning and color). The experiment was conducted with and without vibratory stimulation applied to the palms. Brain hemodynamics were monitored using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) in the frontal and somatosensory areas, while autonomic nervous system activity was assessed via electrocardiogram (ECG) heart rate variability. The experimental protocol involved three repetitions of a sequence including rest periods, the 300-second Tracking task, and the 300-second Stroop test, with fNIRS and ECG recorded throughout. For fNIRS analysis, the authors used a metric called δoxyHb, derived from a differential filter applied to oxygenated hemoglobin concentration, to assess trends in cerebral blood flow. Results indicated that vibratory stimulation significantly improved performance in the Tracking task, reducing both average tracking error (15.13 vs. 18.76 pixels) and error variance (10.74 vs. 26.25 pixels), with differences reaching marginal statistical significance (p < 0.1). In contrast, performance on the Stroop test, measured by reaction time and accuracy, was not affected by the stimulation. Physiological data revealed that vibratory stimulation shifted autonomic balance toward sympathetic dominance. ECG high-frequency (HF) power was lower, and the low-frequency/high-frequency (LF/HF) ratio was higher during stimulation compared to the no-stimulation condition in both tasks. fNIRS results showed that δoxyHb in the somatosensory cortex was lower during the Tracking task with stimulation, suggesting a refraining of this area, while frontal activation patterns differed between tasks. The authors interpret the reduced somatosensory blood flow during the Tracking task as potentially allowing other brain regions to allocate more resources to the task, thereby improving stability. The findings suggest that 200 Hz vibratory stimulation is effective for enhancing performance in monotonous, repetitive tasks like vehicle tracking, but does not impact complex cognitive decision-making tasks like the Stroop test. The study concludes that integrating such vibratory stimuli into vehicle interfaces could help reduce traffic accidents caused by driver fatigue and inattention. Future research is recommended to examine other brain areas, such as the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, to fully understand the neural mechanisms behind these performance improvements.

Provenance

The full processing record for this entry. Every stage of this paper's journey through the pipeline is logged — what ran, with which tool and model, how many attempts it took, and when it last completed.

StageOutcomeToolModelPromptAttemptsCompleted
discover success Crossref 1 2026-08-09
archive success canonical_url 1 2026-08-09
extract success cached 5 2026-08-23
clean success clean 2 2026-08-10
chunk success chunk 2 2026-08-10
embed success embed Qwen/Qwen3-Embedding-8B 2 2026-08-10
promote success 1 2026-08-09
summarize success llm qwen3.8-27b-gittensor summ-v5 3 2026-08-23
tag success vector_similarity 17 2026-08-11
verify success 2 2026-08-09

Summary generated by qwen3.8-27b-gittensor on 2026-08-23; verification: pending re-verification.

Topics

Ranked by relevance to this paper. Hover a topic for its definition.

Information type

What kind of knowledge this paper contributes, grouped by family — independent of topic (what it is about) and method (how it was studied).