Effects of developing data recording technologies on the reliability of accident reconstruction and liability determination

Vida, Gábor; Török, Árpád · 2025 · OpenAlex-citations

DOI: 10.1186/s12544-025-00727-8

archive: archived pipeline: cataloged verified

Get this paper ↗ (DOI — opens at the source; we link to it, we don't host it)

Summary

This study addresses the lack of quantitative methods to measure how advancements in data recording technologies improve the "assessability" of road accidents. Assessability is defined as the accuracy with which an accident process can be reconstructed and liability determined. While Event Data Recorders (EDRs) and other technologies are increasingly common, there is no established framework to quantify their impact on investigation success across different accident types. The authors aim to fill this gap by proposing a methodology to quantify how specific recording technologies affect assessability, thereby guiding future technical development in the automotive industry. The researchers utilized a publicly available dataset of 123 fully investigated road accidents in Hungary between 1998 and 2022. The study classified accidents into seven categories (e.g., destabilization, head-on collisions, accidents at traffic lights) and assessability into four ordinal levels based on the certainty of technical reconstruction and legal liability determination. Three data recording technologies were analyzed: traditional methods (police scene investigation), EDR technology (standard vehicle data like speed and brake status), and EDR+ (advanced data including GNSS, ECU interventions, and video). An ordered logit regression model was employed to analyze the relationship between accident category, recording technology, and assessability levels. The results indicate that the regression model fits the data well, explaining approximately 44.2% to 66.3% of the variability in assessability depending on the pseudo R² indicator used. The analysis reveals that different accident categories benefit to varying degrees from technological advancements. For instance, the study demonstrates that while traditional methods often result in lower assessability levels for complex accident types, the application of EDR and EDR+ technologies significantly increases the probability of achieving higher assessability levels. The model parameters allow for the calculation of cumulative probabilities, showing that advanced data recording is particularly effective in resolving uncertainties in liability and reconstruction for specific accident scenarios. The significance of this work lies in providing a data-driven tool for decision-makers in the automotive industry and regulatory bodies. By quantifying the impact of specific data types on accident assessability, the methodology helps identify which recording technologies are most critical for emerging accident types, such as those involving highly automated or self-driving vehicles. This approach enables the efficient allocation of resources in developing data recording systems, ensuring that future technologies prioritize data that most effectively supports accurate accident reconstruction and liability determination.

Provenance

The full processing record for this entry. Every stage of this paper's journey through the pipeline is logged — what ran, with which tool and model, how many attempts it took, and when it last completed.

StageOutcomeToolModelPromptAttemptsCompleted
discover success OpenAlex-citations 1 2026-06-20
archive success unpaywall 2 2026-06-26
extract success cached 2 2026-06-26
clean success clean 1 2026-06-20
chunk success chunk 1 2026-06-20
embed success embed Qwen/Qwen3-Embedding-8B 1 2026-06-20
promote success 1 2026-06-20
summarize success llm qwen3.6-27b-prismaquant summ-v5 1 2026-06-26
tag success vector_similarity 6 2026-06-20
verify success 1 2026-06-26

Summary generated by qwen3.6-27b-prismaquant on 2026-06-26; verification: verified.

Topics

Ranked by relevance to this paper. Hover a topic for its definition.

Information type

What kind of knowledge this paper contributes, grouped by family — independent of topic (what it is about) and method (how it was studied).