2007 safety belt usage survey in Kentucky.
archive: archived pipeline: cataloged verified
Get this paper ↗ (full text — opens at the source; we link to it, we don't host it)
Summary
This report presents the findings of the 2007 safety belt and child safety seat usage survey conducted in Kentucky by the University of Kentucky Transportation Center in cooperation with the Kentucky State Police. The study aimed to establish statewide usage rates and evaluate the impact of legislative changes, specifically the transition from secondary to primary enforcement of the mandatory safety belt law, which took effect with fines in January 2007 following an educational period in 2006. The research also tracked long-term trends since the inception of statewide observational surveys in 1982. Data were collected at 200 randomly selected sites across Kentucky, stratified by geographic region, roadway functional classification, and vehicle miles traveled to ensure a representative sample. Observers recorded safety belt usage for drivers and front-seat passengers, as well as restraint usage for children under four years of age in both front and rear seats. The survey also included observations of motorcycle and bicycle helmet usage. Data collection occurred between June and August 2007, with two hours of observation per site. Statistical analysis weighted the results by vehicle miles traveled to determine statewide rates, with a total sample size of 115,524 front-seat occupants. The 2007 statewide safety belt usage rate for all front-seat occupants was 71.8%, a significant increase from 67.2% in 2006. This marked the highest usage rate since surveys began, substantially exceeding the 42% rate recorded in 1993 prior to the original statewide law. Usage varied by region, with the highest rates in the north (76.2%) and the lowest in the east (62.8%). By vehicle type, vans (78.1%) and SUVs (76.3%) had the highest usage, while pickup trucks had the lowest (60.1%). Child restraint usage for those under four was 98.5%, the highest recorded rate, with significantly higher compliance in rear seats compared to front seats. Motorcycle helmet usage remained low at 56%, reflecting the repeal of the mandatory helmet law in 1998. The findings indicate that the shift to primary enforcement, coupled with active enforcement and publicity, drove the substantial increase in safety belt usage. The authors conclude that continued enforcement is necessary to maintain these gains, particularly in regions and vehicle categories with lower compliance, such as eastern Kentucky and pickup trucks. The report also recommends reconsidering the enactment of a motorcycle helmet law due to low compliance and associated injury risks.
Key finding
The statewide safety belt usage rate for all front-seat occupants increased to 71.8 percent in 2007, a significant rise from 67.2 percent in 2006, which the authors attribute to the implementation of primary enforcement and associated education campaigns.
Methodology
on_road
Sample size: 115524
Provenance
The full processing record for this entry. Every stage of this paper's journey through the pipeline is logged — what ran, with which tool and model, how many attempts it took, and when it last completed. Discovered via bulk_ingest_rosap on 2026-05-23 (6 acquisition events logged).
| Stage | Outcome | Tool | Model | Prompt | Attempts | Completed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| discover | success | rosap | — | — | 2 | 2026-05-23 |
| archive | success | — | — | — | 1 | 2026-05-23 |
| extract | success | cached | — | — | 2 | 2026-06-10 |
| clean | success | — | — | — | 1 | 2026-06-01 |
| chunk | success | — | — | — | 1 | 2026-06-01 |
| embed | success | — | — | — | 1 | 2026-06-02 |
| enrich | success | — | — | — | 1 | 2026-05-23 |
| promote | success | — | — | — | 1 | 2026-05-23 |
| summarize | success | llm | qwen3.6-27b-prismaquant | summ-v5 | 3 | 2026-06-10 |
| tag | success | vector_similarity | — | — | 24 | 2026-06-11 |
| verify | success | — | — | — | 2 | 2026-06-10 |
Summary generated by qwen3.6-27b-prismaquant on 2026-06-10; verification: verified.
Topics
Ranked by relevance to this paper. Hover a topic for its definition.
Information type
What kind of knowledge this paper contributes, grouped by family — independent of topic (what it is about) and method (how it was studied).
- Empirical Findings: observational prevalence