Development of Support Systems, Instructional Modules, and a Case Study for the Enhanced Driving Simulator at the Gator Tech Smart House
archive: archived pipeline: cataloged verified
Get this paper ↗ (full text — opens at the source; we link to it, we don't host it)
Summary
This report details the development of administrative support systems, instructional modules, and operational protocols for the University of Florida’s Driving Simulator Lab, located at the Gator Tech Smart House. Following a Fall 2016 upgrade with a new system from Realtime Technologies Inc. (RTI), the lab aimed to serve as a shared resource for multi-disciplinary researchers studying human-vehicle interactions. The primary objective was to establish the infrastructure necessary for safe, collaborative, and efficient use of the simulator by diverse user groups, including faculty, staff, and students. To design these support systems, the authors conducted a comparative analysis of existing driving simulator labs. They reviewed the websites of various institutions, such as the University of Michigan and University of Wisconsin, to identify best practices for public outreach and information dissemination. Additionally, the team distributed a questionnaire to managers at other RTI-equipped labs to gather insights on staffing, financial models, training procedures, and safety protocols. Responses from institutions like the University of Wisconsin and Oregon State University informed the UF lab’s administrative structure, highlighting the importance of dedicated lab management, clear fee structures, and standardized safety guidelines. The project resulted in the creation of two distinct web resources. A public website provides general information, project listings, and contact forms for stakeholders. A private, access-controlled intranet site serves UF personnel with operational content, including training materials, protocol documentation, and support ticketing systems. The team developed self-learning PowerPoint modules covering equipment startup, scenario creation using SimCreator, and data retrieval. Furthermore, comprehensive administrative protocols were established, distinguishing between "Full Projects" requiring customized budgets and Memorandums of Understanding, and "Pilot Projects" charged at a weekly rate for feasibility testing. A detailed case study outlines the standard operating procedure for running a simulation experiment. This protocol covers pre-simulation preparation, including equipment setup and participant consent; during-simulation monitoring, which includes tracking simulation sickness and recording data via OBS Studio; and post-simulation procedures, such as data verification, participant debriefing, and facility cleanup. The report emphasizes safety and data integrity, recommending specific file naming conventions and regular backups. By implementing these structured support systems and training materials, the UF Driving Simulator Lab is positioned to facilitate rigorous research while ensuring the safety of participants and the longevity of the complex simulation hardware.
Key finding
The project successfully established a dual-website infrastructure and comprehensive training modules to support administrative and operational use of the University of Florida's driving simulator.
Methodology
other
Provenance
The full processing record for this entry. Every stage of this paper's journey through the pipeline is logged — what ran, with which tool and model, how many attempts it took, and when it last completed. Discovered via bulk_ingest_rosap on 2026-05-23 (45 acquisition events logged).
| Stage | Outcome | Tool | Model | Prompt | Attempts | Completed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| discover | success | rosap | — | — | 2 | 2026-05-23 |
| archive | success | — | — | — | 1 | 2026-05-23 |
| extract | success | cached | — | — | 4 | 2026-06-10 |
| clean | success | — | — | — | 1 | 2026-06-01 |
| chunk | success | — | — | — | 1 | 2026-06-01 |
| embed | success | — | — | — | 1 | 2026-06-02 |
| enrich | success | — | — | — | 1 | 2026-05-23 |
| promote | success | — | — | — | 1 | 2026-05-23 |
| summarize | success | llm | qwen3.6-27b-prismaquant | summ-v5 | 42 | 2026-06-10 |
| tag | success | vector_similarity | — | — | 19 | 2026-06-11 |
| verify | success | — | — | — | 2 | 2026-06-10 |
Summary generated by qwen3.6-27b-prismaquant on 2026-06-10; verification: verified.
Topics
Ranked by relevance to this paper. Hover a topic for its definition.
Information type
What kind of knowledge this paper contributes, grouped by family — independent of topic (what it is about) and method (how it was studied).
- Methodological Resource: tool software, validation psychometrics
- Theoretical Contribution: computational model