Can Your Older Patients Drive Safely?

Staplin, Loren; Lococo, Kathy H.; Mastromatto, Tia; Sifrit, Kathy J.; Trazzera, Kathleen M. · 2017 · ROSA P / Wolters Kluwer

archive: archived pipeline: cataloged verified

Get this paper ↗ (full text — opens at the source; we link to it, we don't host it)

Summary

This review article addresses the public health challenge of ensuring the safety of older drivers, a demographic that is rapidly growing and increasingly reliant on personal vehicles for mobility. The authors argue that while driving independence is vital for successful aging, normal age-related functional decline and prevalent age-associated diseases significantly impair driving abilities, elevating the risk of motor vehicle accidents and severe injury. The paper aims to guide clinicians, particularly nurses, in identifying at-risk patients, initiating conversations about driving safety, and facilitating appropriate referrals or alternative transportation solutions. The authors analyze data from the Federal Highway Administration and the Fatality Analysis Reporting System (2006–2015) to establish demographic trends and crash risks. They highlight that while drivers aged 65–74 are underrepresented in fatal crashes relative to their population share, those aged 75 and older are consistently overrepresented. The review synthesizes existing research on environmental risks, noting that older drivers are most vulnerable on arterials with high traffic density and during complex maneuvers like left turns or navigating intersections with flashing signals. Furthermore, the paper details specific functional declines linked to crash risk, including reduced contrast sensitivity, visual acuity, executive function (specifically response inhibition and divided attention), working memory, and psychomotor limitations such as reduced range of motion and strength. Key findings indicate that drivers aged 75 and older face higher fatality rates due to increased physical fragility and functional impairment. Specific medical conditions, including cataracts, glaucoma, stroke, diabetes, and Parkinson’s disease, are identified as significant contributors to driving deficits. The authors emphasize that decline is related to functional status rather than chronological age alone. They recommend specific screening tools for clinicians, such as the Trail Making Test Part B, the Useful Field of View test, and maze tests, which are validated predictors of crash risk. The paper also notes that interventions like cataract surgery and physical exercise programs (e.g., tai chi, yoga) can improve driving performance. The significance of this work lies in its practical guidance for preventive medicine. The authors conclude that clinicians should routinely assess driving safety, particularly for patients with cognitive impairments, recent falls, or medication changes. They advocate for a spectrum of interventions, ranging from patient education and self-regulation strategies to referrals for formal driver rehabilitation specialists. For patients who can no longer drive safely, the paper stresses the importance of connecting them with community resources and alternative transportation options to maintain independence and quality of life, while also outlining the legal and ethical considerations regarding mandatory reporting to state licensing agencies.

Key finding

Drivers aged 75 and older are overrepresented in fatal crashes relative to their licensed population share, with errors at yield sign-controlled intersections responsible for 26 of 27 fatal crashes in one study cohort.

Methodology

review

Provenance

The full processing record for this entry. Every stage of this paper's journey through the pipeline is logged — what ran, with which tool and model, how many attempts it took, and when it last completed. Discovered via bulk_ingest_rosap on 2026-05-23 (6 acquisition events logged).

StageOutcomeToolModelPromptAttemptsCompleted
discover success rosap 2 2026-05-23
archive success 1 2026-05-23
extract success cached 2 2026-06-10
clean success 1 2026-06-01
chunk success 1 2026-06-01
embed success 1 2026-06-02
enrich success 1 2026-05-23
promote success 1 2026-05-23
summarize success llm qwen3.6-27b-prismaquant summ-v5 3 2026-06-10
tag success vector_similarity 19 2026-06-11
verify success 2 2026-06-10

Summary generated by qwen3.6-27b-prismaquant on 2026-06-10; verification: verified.

Topics

Ranked by relevance to this paper. Hover a topic for its definition.

Information type

What kind of knowledge this paper contributes, grouped by family — independent of topic (what it is about) and method (how it was studied).