expert witness methodology
Methods and standards for human-factors expert testimony: admissibility (Daubert/Frye), reliability of forensic methods, qualification and bias, error rates, and best-practice frameworks for HF opinions in court. About HOW expert analysis should be conducted and defended, not the substantive analyses themselves — PRT (perception_reaction_time), visibility (visibility_analysis_litigation), conspicuity (conspicuity_in_litigation), or reconstruction (crash_reconstruction_hf).
9 paper(s) · ranked by relevance to this topic
-
Requirements for and Preparation of Human Factors Professionals: Three Perspectives ↗ · 1981 · Mocharnuk, John B. et al. · indexed
-
Knowledge Acquisition Methods for the IHDS Diagnostic Review Expert System · 1997 · Hughes, Warren E. et al. · archived
-
The Application of Human Factors to the Development of Expert Systems for Advanced Cockpits ↗ · 1987 · Endsley, Mica R. · indexed
-
Human Factors Guidelines for Road Systems: Second Edition ↗ · 2012 · Campbell, John L. et al. · indexed
-
-
Estimating across-trial variability parameters of the Diffusion Decision Model: Expert advice and recommendations · 2018 · Boehm, Udo et al. · archived
-
B – 146 Performance Validity Tests Base Rates For Litigant And Non-litigant Patients ↗ · 2025 · Senderling, Sarah et al. · indexed
-
Prosecutors Working with Victim Advocate Groups · 2011 · Talpins, Steven et al. · archived
-
The Model of Support for the Decision-Making Process, While Organizing Dredging Works in the Ports ↗ · 2021 · Kaizer, Adam et al. · indexed