Traffic Safety Climate Factors in Explaining Driving Behaviours and Traffic Crash Involvement: Comparative Study Among Male and Female Drivers

Atombo, Charles; Wu, Chaozhong · 2022 · DOAJ

DOI: 10.33492/JRS-D-21-00036

archive: archived pipeline: cataloged verified

Get this paper ↗ (DOI — opens at the source; we link to it, we don't host it)

Summary

This study investigates how Traffic Safety Climate (TSC) factors explain driving behaviors and traffic crash involvement, specifically comparing male and female drivers in China. Motivated by the high rate of traffic fatalities in China and the established link between driver perception of traffic conditions and safety outcomes, the research aims to identify sex-based differences in how TSC influences driving styles and crash risks. The authors seek to determine which demographic groups are most susceptible to specific driving behaviors, thereby informing targeted safety interventions. The researchers conducted a web-based survey of 887 licensed drivers (531 males, 356 females) aged 24–64 across 27 provinces in China. Participants completed validated Chinese versions of the Traffic Safety Climate Scale (measuring External Affective Demand, Functionality, and Internal Requirements) and the Driver Behaviour Questionnaire (measuring violations, errors, and positive driving behaviors). Data were analyzed using independent-sample t-tests to compare sexes and hierarchical regression analyses to examine the predictive power of TSC factors on driving behaviors and crash involvement, controlling for age, mileage, and license duration. Results indicated that male drivers reported significantly higher levels of driving violations and traffic crash involvement than female drivers. Regression analyses revealed that perceived External Affective Demand (EAD)—characterized by emotional engagement such as aggression or pressure—was positively associated with aberrant driving behaviors and negatively associated with positive driving behaviors. This effect was particularly pronounced among young and middle-aged male drivers. Conversely, perceived Internal Requirements (skills and caution) and Functionality (system efficiency) were positively related to positive driving behaviors and negatively related to aberrant behaviors for both sexes. Notably, young female drivers exhibited higher positive driving behaviors and lower crash probabilities compared to their male counterparts. While male drivers across all age brackets reported more positive behaviors when perceiving high functionality, they remained more prone to violations and crashes overall. The study concludes that traffic safety climate perceptions significantly influence driving behaviors and crash risks differently across sexes and age groups. The findings suggest that external emotional demands in traffic environments exacerbate risky behaviors, particularly among men, while functional and internal cognitive requirements promote safer driving. The authors recommend that traffic authorities focus on modifying traffic infrastructure designs to reduce emotional stressors and enhance system functionality, thereby mitigating aberrant behaviors and improving overall road safety.

Provenance

The full processing record for this entry. Every stage of this paper's journey through the pipeline is logged — what ran, with which tool and model, how many attempts it took, and when it last completed.

StageOutcomeToolModelPromptAttemptsCompleted
discover success DOAJ 1 2026-06-19
archive success unpaywall 1 2026-06-26
extract success cached 2 2026-06-26
clean success clean 1 2026-06-19
chunk success chunk 1 2026-06-19
embed success embed Qwen/Qwen3-Embedding-8B 1 2026-06-19
promote success 1 2026-06-19
summarize success llm qwen3.6-27b-prismaquant summ-v5 1 2026-06-26
tag success vector_similarity 6 2026-06-19
verify partial 1 2026-06-26

Summary generated by qwen3.6-27b-prismaquant on 2026-06-26; verification: verified_with_issues.

Topics

Ranked by relevance to this paper. Hover a topic for its definition.

Information type

What kind of knowledge this paper contributes, grouped by family — independent of topic (what it is about) and method (how it was studied).