Results of Special Accident Study Teams/ASAP Coordination Conference

Fell, James C. · 1974 · ROSA P / United States. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Office of Statistics and Analysis

archive: archived pipeline: cataloged verified

Get this paper ↗ (full text — opens at the source; we link to it, we don't host it)

Summary

This document reports on the second Special Accident Study Teams/ASAP Coordination Conference held in June 1974, organized by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). The conference aimed to coordinate activities between four university-led accident investigation teams (Boston, Baltimore, Albuquerque, and Oklahoma City) and their corresponding Alcohol Safety Action Programs (ASAPs). The primary objectives were to review progress in collecting a standardized minimal set of human factors data, present preliminary findings on alcohol-involved drivers, and discuss the future operational status of the ASAPs and study teams. The studies employed in-depth case investigations to analyze the role of alcohol and drugs in traffic accidents. A key methodological challenge identified was the difficulty in obtaining reliable data for specific variables within the agreed-upon minimal set. Teams reported that data regarding the length of drinking sessions, number of drinks per sitting, reasons for drinking, and medical diagnoses of alcoholism were often vague, variable, or unavailable, rendering these specific elements meaningless for analysis. The Boston team had completed data collection for 300 fatal accident cases, while the Baltimore team analyzed a smaller sample of 33 driver fatals and 20 matched non-fatal accidents. The Albuquerque and Oklahoma City teams were still in preliminary stages, with the latter utilizing a control group in Tulsa to compare fatal accidents across cities. Preliminary findings from the Boston study, which included 268 drivers most responsible for fatal crashes, indicated that 45% of these drivers had alcohol involvement in the focal accident. The study categorized drivers into types based on crash outcomes (killing self, killing another occupant, or killing a pedestrian) and found that the modal age for all groups was 20–29 years. Alcohol-involved drivers were more likely to have prior arrests for driving under the influence and job losses related to alcohol abuse compared to non-alcohol-involved drivers. The Baltimore team noted potential medical correlations between liver cirrhosis and crash survival rates, though statistical analysis was limited by sample size. The conference concluded with guidelines for final reports, mandating fourteen specific bivariate tables and driver profiles to ensure consistency across studies. NHTSA outlined plans for the future, noting that 10–12 of the 35 ASAPs would continue operations, while others would undergo evaluation. The accident study teams were advised to seek continued funding through NHTSA requests for proposals or state-level accident investigation programs. The document serves as both a progress report and a methodological guide for ongoing federal evaluation of alcohol countermeasures.

Key finding

Data collection for variables regarding drinking duration, quantity per sitting, and reasons for drinking was reported as unreliable or uncollectable by all four study teams.

Methodology

mixed_methods

Provenance

The full processing record for this entry. Every stage of this paper's journey through the pipeline is logged — what ran, with which tool and model, how many attempts it took, and when it last completed. Discovered via bulk_ingest_rosap on 2026-05-23 (6 acquisition events logged).

StageOutcomeToolModelPromptAttemptsCompleted
discover success rosap 2 2026-05-23
archive success 1 2026-05-23
extract success cached 2 2026-06-10
clean success 1 2026-06-01
chunk success 1 2026-06-01
embed success 1 2026-06-02
enrich success 1 2026-05-23
promote success 1 2026-05-23
summarize success llm qwen3.6-27b-prismaquant summ-v5 3 2026-06-10
tag success vector_similarity 19 2026-06-11
verify success 2 2026-06-10

Summary generated by qwen3.6-27b-prismaquant on 2026-06-10; verification: verified.

Topics

Ranked by relevance to this paper. Hover a topic for its definition.

Information type

What kind of knowledge this paper contributes, grouped by family — independent of topic (what it is about) and method (how it was studied).