Implementation plan for combating the drug-impaired driver.
archive: archived pipeline: cataloged verified
Get this paper ↗ (full text — opens at the source; we link to it, we don't host it)
Summary
This document outlines the implementation plan for Virginia’s revised drug-impaired driving (DUID) statute, which took effect on April 1, 1988. The legislation was motivated by the need to address drivers impaired by drugs other than alcohol, a problem previously obscured by laws construed as alcohol-specific. The new statute defines a DUID offense as driving under the influence to a degree that impairs safe driving ability and grants police authority to require blood tests for drugs, either before or after alcohol testing. Refusal to submit to such tests results in license suspension under implied consent laws. However, positive drug test results are admissible only as corroborating evidence of impairment, not as proof of impairment itself. To facilitate effective enforcement, the Virginia Department of Motor Vehicles established a Task Force to Combat the Drug-Impaired Driver, comprising local, state, and federal officials. The plan focuses on five key areas: chemical testing, public information and education, a pilot Drug Recognition Technician (DRT) program, statewide enforcement, and treatment. The Division of Consolidated Laboratory Services was tasked with establishing policies and securing funding for drug blood testing. Public awareness campaigns were coordinated by the Virginia Department of State Police (VSP) and the DMV to orient law enforcement, prosecutors, and the public to the new legal standards. A central component of the strategy is the pilot DRT program, modeled after the Los Angeles Police Department’s Drug Recognition Expert program. Pilot sites were selected in Charlottesville and Virginia Beach, with participation from the VSP. Officers undergo intensive training to identify physiological signs of drug impairment and specific drug classes. The plan emphasizes that DRT testimony must be supported by chemical tests and that field screening must be improved to ensure all impaired drivers, not just those with high blood-alcohol levels or distinctive drug odors, are identified. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) provided training resources, aiming to certify an initial cadre of officers by mid-1988 and expand to approximately 100 qualified DRTs by April 1989. The plan also addresses statewide enforcement through the promotion of Standardized Field Sobriety Testing (SFST) techniques to establish impairment objectively. The Virginia Transportation Research Council (VTRC) was charged with evaluating the program’s effectiveness, specifically comparing arrest, prosecution, and conviction rates between DRTs and non-DRTs in pilot areas. Additionally, the existing Alcohol Safety Action Programs (ASAPs) were adapted to provide assessment and treatment for court-referred DUID offenders. The document concludes by detailing the specific roles of each agency and the timeline for training and evaluation, aiming to create a comprehensive system for detecting, prosecuting, and treating drug-impaired drivers.
Key finding
The implementation plan establishes a pilot Drug Recognition Technician program in two jurisdictions to improve the detection and prosecution of drug-impaired drivers through specialized training and standardized field sobriety testing.
Methodology
other
Provenance
The full processing record for this entry. Every stage of this paper's journey through the pipeline is logged — what ran, with which tool and model, how many attempts it took, and when it last completed. Discovered via bulk_ingest_rosap on 2026-05-23 (6 acquisition events logged).
| Stage | Outcome | Tool | Model | Prompt | Attempts | Completed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| discover | success | rosap | — | — | 2 | 2026-05-23 |
| archive | success | — | — | — | 1 | 2026-05-23 |
| extract | success | cached | — | — | 2 | 2026-06-10 |
| clean | success | — | — | — | 1 | 2026-06-01 |
| chunk | success | — | — | — | 1 | 2026-06-01 |
| embed | success | — | — | — | 1 | 2026-06-02 |
| enrich | success | — | — | — | 1 | 2026-05-23 |
| promote | success | — | — | — | 1 | 2026-05-23 |
| summarize | success | llm | qwen3.6-27b-prismaquant | summ-v5 | 3 | 2026-06-10 |
| tag | success | vector_similarity | — | — | 19 | 2026-06-11 |
| verify | success | — | — | — | 2 | 2026-06-10 |
Summary generated by qwen3.6-27b-prismaquant on 2026-06-10; verification: verified.
Topics
Ranked by relevance to this paper. Hover a topic for its definition.
Information type
What kind of knowledge this paper contributes, grouped by family — independent of topic (what it is about) and method (how it was studied).
- Applied Guidance: countermeasure evaluation, policy recommendations