Determinants of Youth Attitudes and Skills towards Which Drinking/Driving Prevention Programs Should Be Directed
archive: archived pipeline: cataloged verified
Get this paper ↗ (full text — opens at the source; we link to it, we don't host it)
Summary
This 1987 report by the Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation, commissioned by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), addresses the need to improve youth drinking and driving (DWI) and riding with an impaired driver (RWID) prevention programs. The study was motivated by findings from a prior Phase One analysis, which revealed that existing prevention strategies relied on five categories of assumptions—alternatives, life skills, information, peer pressure, and normative factors—with limited empirical support. Furthermore, Phase One suggested that current programs ignored situational variables and lacked data on youth acceptability of prevention strategies. Phase Two aimed to validate these assumptions, explore situational risk factors, and assess the acceptability of popular prevention methods. The research employed a multi-component design across five diverse geographic locations (Los Angeles, Sacramento, Espanola, Omaha, and Washington, D.C.) to ensure ethnic and geographic representation. Component I involved a survey of 1,323 youth from junior highs, high schools, and community colleges, measuring demographics, lifestyle variables, alcohol use, and nine scales of stable risk factors. Component II utilized in-depth interviews with youth who reported recent DWI or RWID incidents to identify situational variables such as social context, mood, and transportation availability. Component III conducted focus groups to evaluate youth reactions to eleven specific prevention strategies, including SADD clubs, parent contracts, and safe-ride programs. The study analyzed the validity of stable risk factors, finding that current prevention assumptions required refinement based on the survey data. It examined the interaction between stable predisposing factors and situational variables, determining the relative importance of each in predicting DWI and RWID behaviors. The interviews highlighted that situational factors, such as the lack of alternative transportation or social pressure within specific contexts, played a significant role in youth decisions to drink and drive or ride with impaired drivers. Additionally, the focus groups provided insights into which prevention strategies were viewed as acceptable or unappealing by youth, identifying barriers to the utilization of existing programs like SADD and Project Graduation. The significance of this research lies in its comprehensive approach to refining DWI prevention efforts by integrating both stable and situational risk factors. The findings provided evidence-based recommendations for reconceptualizing prevention programs to better align with youth attitudes and actual behavioral contexts. By validating specific risk factors and assessing the acceptability of interventions, the report offered NHTSA and other stakeholders a framework for developing more effective, targeted strategies to reduce youth alcohol-related traffic incidents. The study underscored the importance of considering situational dynamics and youth preferences in the design of prevention initiatives, moving beyond theoretical assumptions to empirically supported practices.
Key finding
Situational factors, specifically the unavailability of alternative transportation and immediate perception of risk, significantly contributed to youth drinking and driving and riding with an impaired driver incidents, often overriding stable predisposing factors.
Methodology
mixed_methods
Sample size: 1323
Provenance
The full processing record for this entry. Every stage of this paper's journey through the pipeline is logged — what ran, with which tool and model, how many attempts it took, and when it last completed. Discovered via bulk_ingest_rosap on 2026-05-23 (6 acquisition events logged).
| Stage | Outcome | Tool | Model | Prompt | Attempts | Completed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| discover | success | rosap | — | — | 2 | 2026-05-23 |
| archive | success | — | — | — | 1 | 2026-05-23 |
| extract | success | cached | — | — | 2 | 2026-06-10 |
| clean | success | — | — | — | 1 | 2026-06-01 |
| chunk | success | — | — | — | 1 | 2026-06-01 |
| embed | success | — | — | — | 1 | 2026-06-02 |
| enrich | success | — | — | — | 1 | 2026-05-23 |
| promote | success | — | — | — | 1 | 2026-05-23 |
| summarize | success | llm | qwen3.6-27b-prismaquant | summ-v5 | 3 | 2026-06-10 |
| tag | success | vector_similarity | — | — | 19 | 2026-06-11 |
| verify | success | — | — | — | 2 | 2026-06-10 |
Summary generated by qwen3.6-27b-prismaquant on 2026-06-10; verification: verified.
Topics
Ranked by relevance to this paper. Hover a topic for its definition.
Information type
What kind of knowledge this paper contributes, grouped by family — independent of topic (what it is about) and method (how it was studied).
- Empirical Findings: observational prevalence