Simulator Methodology & Validity
1685 papers · 3 topics · filed under How Driving Gets Studied
Research treating the driving simulator itself as the object of study: whether its measurements and its training generalize to real driving.
What's here. Method work on the instrument: simulator_validity_fidelity (correspondence between simulated and on-road measures, motion-base and scenario fidelity, absolute versus relative validity), simulator_training_transfer (whether skill acquired in a simulator carries to the road or to another simulator), and simulator_sickness (incidence, screening, adaptation, dropout, mitigation). Also the surrounding protocol questions such as practice and adaptation procedures, drive duration, and how dropout is handled.
What isn't here.
- evaluations of driver training, education, and coaching programs, even when the program is delivered on a simulator — Training, Education & Intervention. The question here is whether simulator-acquired skill transfers at all; there it is whether a particular curriculum or intervention works.
- motion sickness and ride comfort in real vehicles, including passenger discomfort in automated driving — Vehicle Automation & ADAS. Sickness here means discomfort produced by the simulator apparatus, not by an actual moving vehicle.
- simulator studies whose subject is a driver population rather than the simulator, such as novice, learner, or older drivers and simulator-based fitness-to-drive assessment — Age & Experience. Simulators are the workhorse method across most of this reference; a paper lands here only when the method itself is what is being validated or characterized.
Topics in this category
Related categories
Categories whose papers overlap this one far more than chance predicts. Where the area differs, the hierarchy would not have shown you the link.