Assessing the Driver’s Current Level of Working Memory Load with High Density Functional Near-infrared Spectroscopy: A Realistic Driving Simulator Study

Unni, Anirudh; Ihme, Klas; Jipp, Meike; Rieger, Jochem W. · 2017 · Crossref

DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00167

archive: archived pipeline: cataloged verified

Get this paper ↗ (DOI — opens at the source; we link to it, we don't host it)

Summary

This study addresses the challenge of reliably measuring driver cognitive workload in realistic scenarios to enable adaptive automation systems that adjust support based on the driver’s mental state. Cognitive overload or underload can lead to fatal errors, yet existing methods often rely on peripheral physiological measures (e.g., heart rate) that lack specificity to working memory load or are limited to laboratory settings. The authors aimed to continuously quantify working memory load during driving using high-density functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) and identify predictive brain regions. The researchers conducted a realistic driving simulator study with 19 participants (15 included in final analysis) who drove for approximately 60 minutes on a virtual highway with concurrent traffic. Working memory load was manipulated using a modified n-back task integrated into speed regulation, inducing five load levels (0-back to 4-back). Participants had to memorize and recall previous speed signs to adjust their driving speed accordingly. Brain activity was measured using a 78-channel whole-head fNIRS system covering frontal, parietal, and temporo-occipital areas. The study also recorded electrocardiogram (ECG) data and driving behavior metrics. Multivariate lasso regression combined with cross-validation was used to predict continuous working memory load levels from fNIRS data, while linear mixed-effects models analyzed behavioral and physiological responses. The results demonstrated that whole-head fNIRS could predict variations in working memory load with a mean Pearson correlation of 0.61 (maximum 0.8) between induced and predicted levels. This performance significantly outperformed predictions based on peripheral heart rate parameters, which yielded a mean correlation of only 0.21. Furthermore, restricting the analysis to prefrontal sensors reduced the mean correlation to 0.38, indicating that whole-head coverage provides superior predictive power. Univariate analysis revealed increasing brain activation in bilateral inferior frontal and bilateral temporo-occipital areas with higher working memory loads. Behaviorally, higher n-back levels correlated with increased reaction times and greater deviations from the lane center, confirming the cognitive demand of the task. The study concludes that whole-head fNIRS is a viable method for continuously assessing driver working memory load in realistic environments, offering greater accuracy than peripheral physiological measures or limited prefrontal fNIRS setups. The identification of specific brain regions involved in workload-related processing supports the development of adaptive automation systems capable of monitoring driver cognitive states in real-time. This approach helps disentangle cognitive workload from emotional or physical states, paving the way for safer, more responsive driver assistance technologies.

Provenance

The full processing record for this entry. Every stage of this paper's journey through the pipeline is logged — what ran, with which tool and model, how many attempts it took, and when it last completed.

StageOutcomeToolModelPromptAttemptsCompleted
discover success Crossref 1 2026-06-06
archive success canonical_url 1 2026-06-09
extract success pdftotext 2 2026-06-09
clean success clean 1 2026-06-09
chunk success chunk 1 2026-06-09
embed success embed Qwen/Qwen3-Embedding-8B 1 2026-06-09
enrich success semantic_scholar 1 2026-06-09
promote success 1 2026-06-06
summarize success llm qwen3.6-27b-prismaquant summ-v5 1 2026-06-09
tag success vector_similarity 8 2026-06-11
verify success 1 2026-06-09

Summary generated by qwen3.6-27b-prismaquant on 2026-06-09; verification: verified.

Topics

Ranked by relevance to this paper. Hover a topic for its definition.

Information type

What kind of knowledge this paper contributes, grouped by family — independent of topic (what it is about) and method (how it was studied).