The design of an in-vehicle assistance system to support eco-driving
DOI: 10.1016/j.trc.2015.04.013
archive: archived pipeline: cataloged verified
Get this paper ↗ (DOI — opens at the source; we link to it, we don't host it)
Summary
This study addresses the design of in-vehicle assistance systems to support eco-driving, specifically focusing on providing real-time guidance for fuel-efficient accelerator pedal usage. Motivated by the potential for significant fuel savings through behavioral changes and the limitations of long-term training effects, the research aims to identify the most effective and acceptable interface modality for continuous driver support. The study compares three systems—selected from a prior pilot: a visual-auditory display, a haptic force feedback pedal, and a haptic stiffness feedback pedal—to determine which best improves fuel economy without compromising safety or increasing driver workload. The research employed a driving simulator study with 24 participants who completed four drives each, one with no assistance (baseline) and three with the different assistance systems. The experimental design was fully counterbalanced. Participants navigated a 14km route involving urban and rural sections, requiring acceleration, deceleration, and speed maintenance tasks. The systems provided moment-by-moment guidance on optimal pedal angles (0% for deceleration, 7% for maintenance, 15% for acceleration). The visual-auditory system used a color-coded dashboard icon and auditory tones, while the haptic systems altered pedal resistance profiles to discourage over-acceleration or encourage under-acceleration. Data collected included objective measures of pedal error, vehicle control, eye-tracking, and subjective assessments of workload and acceptability. The results indicated that the haptic force system was the most effective for preventing over-acceleration during deceleration scenarios, yielding significantly lower root mean squared pedal errors and standard deviations compared to the haptic stiffness and visual-auditory systems. Conversely, minimal differences were observed among the systems regarding their ability to prevent under-acceleration. Safety metrics revealed that the visual-auditory interface reduced the time drivers spent looking at the road, suggesting a negative impact on situational awareness. Subjective data aligned with these findings; the haptic systems generated lower perceived workload than the visual-auditory interface. While the haptic force system was rated as more useful, the haptic stiffness system was judged more acceptable for use due to its subtler feedback. The significance of these findings lies in providing evidence-based recommendations for the design of user-friendly eco-driving devices. The study concludes that haptic accelerator pedal systems, particularly those using force feedback, offer superior performance in guiding drivers toward fuel-efficient acceleration patterns while maintaining lower cognitive workload and better safety profiles than visual-auditory alternatives. These insights support the development of in-vehicle technologies that can sustainably improve fuel economy by integrating real-time, non-distracting guidance into the primary driving task.
Provenance
The full processing record for this entry. Every stage of this paper's journey through the pipeline is logged — what ran, with which tool and model, how many attempts it took, and when it last completed.
| Stage | Outcome | Tool | Model | Prompt | Attempts | Completed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| discover | success | OpenAlex-citations | — | — | 1 | 2026-06-17 |
| archive | success | semantic_scholar | — | — | 6 | 2026-06-25 |
| extract | success | pdftotext | — | — | 2 | 2026-06-26 |
| clean | success | clean | — | — | 1 | 2026-06-26 |
| chunk | success | chunk | — | — | 1 | 2026-06-26 |
| embed | success | embed | Qwen/Qwen3-Embedding-8B | — | 1 | 2026-06-26 |
| enrich | success | semantic_scholar | — | — | 5 | 2026-07-05 |
| promote | success | — | — | — | 1 | 2026-06-17 |
| summarize | success | llm | qwen3.6-27b-prismaquant | summ-v5 | 1 | 2026-06-25 |
| tag | success | vector_similarity | — | — | 6 | 2026-06-26 |
| verify | partial | — | — | — | 1 | 2026-06-26 |
Summary generated by qwen3.6-27b-prismaquant on 2026-06-25; verification: verified_with_issues.
Topics
Ranked by relevance to this paper. Hover a topic for its definition.
Information type
What kind of knowledge this paper contributes, grouped by family — independent of topic (what it is about) and method (how it was studied).
- Applied Guidance: design guidelines
- Methodological Resource: tool software
- Theoretical Contribution: computational model