Conference proceedings of the Northeast Autonomous Vehicle Summit.
archive: archived pipeline: cataloged verified
Get this paper ↗ (full text — opens at the source; we link to it, we don't host it)
Summary
This report documents the proceedings of the Northeast Autonomous Vehicle Summit, held in March 2017 to address the technical, logistical, and legal challenges associated with the rapid deployment of autonomous vehicles (AVs). Organized by the University of Connecticut’s Transportation Safety Research Center in cooperation with the Connecticut Department of Transportation and the Federal Highway Administration, the summit aimed to foster dialogue among stakeholders from New England, New York, and New Jersey. The event sought to identify pressing policy issues, document current perceptions, and develop action plans to guide state responses to AV adoption, emphasizing that regulatory frameworks must protect public safety without stifling innovation. The summit methodology combined expert presentations with collaborative workshop sessions. Day one featured presentations from industry leaders, academics, and government officials covering technology readiness, infrastructure impacts, ethical considerations, and policy frameworks. Speakers addressed topics ranging from SAE automation levels and vehicle cybersecurity to societal transitions and the USDOT’s Smart City Challenge. Day two involved workgroups comprising government officials, law enforcement, and private industry representatives. These groups utilized surveys to discuss specific challenges related to licensing, law enforcement training, liability, insurance, and infrastructure maintenance. The workshops concluded with the formulation of targeted action plans designed to track progress and standardize approaches across states. Key findings revealed significant consensus on the need for standardized identification of AVs, such as specific registration markings, to aid law enforcement and DMVs. Participants highlighted critical gaps in law enforcement training, particularly regarding crash investigation, data access from vehicle recorders, and protocols for interacting with AVs during traffic stops. Regarding liability and insurance, no states had yet drafted rules for fault determination in AV crashes; stakeholders emphasized the need for third-party access to vehicle data to resolve disputes between driver behavior and system malfunction. Infrastructure discussions focused on the necessity of maintaining clear road markings and signs, with recommendations for the FHWA’s Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices to lead standardization efforts. Additionally, participants debated the appropriateness of requiring driver’s licenses for Level 4 and 5 vehicles and identified the need for hybrid insurance policies covering both product liability and individual negligence. The significance of this report lies in its provision of a structured framework for state-level policy development regarding autonomous vehicles. The action plans developed serve as indicators of the most pressing issues for northeastern states, offering a roadmap for legislative and regulatory adaptation. The summit underscored the importance of inter-state coordination and federal guidance to ensure consistent enforcement and safety standards. By documenting these early-stage policy discussions, the report provides a baseline for tracking the evolution of AV regulations and highlights the collaborative effort required between manufacturers, government agencies, and law enforcement to integrate autonomous technology into the transportation system safely and effectively.
Key finding
Stakeholders identified significant regulatory gaps in liability, insurance, and law enforcement protocols, leading to proposed action plans for standardized vehicle identification and cross-state policy coordination.
Methodology
mixed_methods
Provenance
The full processing record for this entry. Every stage of this paper's journey through the pipeline is logged — what ran, with which tool and model, how many attempts it took, and when it last completed. Discovered via bulk_ingest_rosap on 2026-05-23 (6 acquisition events logged).
| Stage | Outcome | Tool | Model | Prompt | Attempts | Completed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| discover | success | rosap | — | — | 2 | 2026-05-23 |
| archive | success | — | — | — | 1 | 2026-05-23 |
| extract | success | cached | — | — | 2 | 2026-06-10 |
| clean | success | — | — | — | 1 | 2026-06-01 |
| chunk | success | — | — | — | 1 | 2026-06-01 |
| embed | success | — | — | — | 1 | 2026-06-02 |
| enrich | success | — | — | — | 1 | 2026-05-23 |
| promote | success | — | — | — | 1 | 2026-05-23 |
| summarize | success | llm | qwen3.6-27b-prismaquant | summ-v5 | 3 | 2026-06-10 |
| tag | success | vector_similarity | — | — | 19 | 2026-06-11 |
| verify | success | — | — | — | 2 | 2026-06-10 |
Summary generated by qwen3.6-27b-prismaquant on 2026-06-10; verification: verified.
Topics
Ranked by relevance to this paper. Hover a topic for its definition.
Information type
What kind of knowledge this paper contributes, grouped by family — independent of topic (what it is about) and method (how it was studied).
- Applied Guidance: policy recommendations
- Synthesis & Review: research agenda
- Theoretical Contribution: conceptual framework