Driver Distraction in NHTSA Databases

Ascone, Debra · 2010 · Crossref

DOI: 10.1037/e731802011-001

archive: archived pipeline: cataloged verified

Get this paper ↗ (DOI — opens at the source; we link to it, we don't host it)

Summary

This research note examines the prevalence and characteristics of driver distraction in the United States by analyzing data from National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) databases and sponsored studies. The study addresses the growing concern regarding distracted driving, particularly involving cell phones and electronic devices, while acknowledging that traditional crash reports may undercount distraction due to reliance on post-crash police investigations and inconsistent reporting standards across jurisdictions. The analysis utilizes data from the Fatality Analysis Reporting System (FARS) and the General Estimates System (GES) for the years 2004–2008. FARS provides a census of fatal crashes, while GES offers nationally representative estimates for crashes of all severities. To address limitations in police-reported data, the note also incorporates findings from the National Motor Vehicle Crash Causation Survey (NMVCCS), which involved on-scene investigation, and the 100-Car Naturalistic Driving Study, an observational study using instrumented vehicles. Additionally, data from the National Occupant Protection Use Survey (NOPUS) and the Motor Vehicle Occupant Safety Survey (MVOSS) were reviewed to assess electronic device usage. Key findings indicate that distraction was reported in 16% of fatal crashes and 21% of injury crashes in 2008. The proportion of fatal crashes involving distraction increased from 11% in 2004 to 16% in 2008. Drivers under 20 had the highest proportion of distraction involvement in fatal crashes (16%), followed by those aged 20–29 (12%). Light-truck drivers and motorcyclists also showed high rates of distraction (12% each). The NMVCCS found that approximately 18% of crashes where the driver was the critical reason involved distraction, with drivers aged 16–25 most frequently engaged in interior non-driving activities. The 100-Car Study revealed that secondary task involvement contributed to over 22% of crashes and near-crashes. NOPUS data estimated that up to 6% of drivers used hand-held electronic devices during daylight hours in 2007. The study concludes that reported distraction rates likely underestimate the true scope of the problem due to underreporting by law enforcement and self-reporting biases. The data highlight younger drivers and specific vehicle types as high-risk groups. These findings underscore the need for improved countermeasures and more sophisticated methods for measuring distraction to mitigate the significant safety risks associated with secondary task involvement and cognitive distractions.

Key finding

Driver distraction was reported in 16 percent of fatal crashes and approximately 21 percent of injury crashes in 2008, with the highest proportion of distracted drivers occurring in the under-20 age group.

Methodology

dataset

Provenance

The full processing record for this entry. Every stage of this paper's journey through the pipeline is logged — what ran, with which tool and model, how many attempts it took, and when it last completed.

Summary generated by qwen3.6-27b-prismaquant on 2026-06-10; verification: verified.

Topics

Ranked by relevance to this paper. Hover a topic for its definition.

• visual
• external distraction
• distraction detection algorithms
• naturalistic crash near crash
• incidence prevalence
• mobile phones

Information type

What kind of knowledge this paper contributes, grouped by family — independent of topic (what it is about) and method (how it was studied).

• Empirical Findings: observational prevalence, crash risk outcomes
• Methodological Resource: dataset resource