Interdependence in Vehicle-Pedestrian Encounters and its Implications for Vehicle Automation

Domeyer, Joshua E.; Lee, John D.; Toyoda, Heishiro; Mehler, Bruce; Reimer, Bryan · 2022 · Crossref

DOI: 10.1109/tits.2020.3041562

archive: archived pipeline: cataloged verified

Get this paper ↗ (DOI — opens at the source; we link to it, we don't host it)

Summary

This study investigates the interdependence of driver and pedestrian behaviors during naturalistic roadway negotiations, aiming to understand how context mediates the social dilemma of right-of-way determination. The research is motivated by the need to model human interaction dynamics for the development of safer and more efficient automated vehicle systems, particularly given the high rate of pedestrian fatalities and the complexity of implicit communication between road users. The authors analyzed a dataset of 228 vehicle-pedestrian encounters extracted from the MIT AgeLab Advanced Vehicle Technology naturalistic driving study. The dataset included interactions at protected intersections (stop signs, traffic lights), designated crossings (crosswalks, parking lots), and undesignated crossings (jaywalking). Using an expanded Actor-Partner Interdependence Model (APIM) within a structural equation modeling framework, the study examined the relationship between the standard deviation of velocity (independent variable) and wait times (dependent variable) for both drivers and pedestrians. The model accounted for external factors such as vehicle maneuvers, lead vehicle presence, and pedestrian group size. Results indicated that the level of intersection protection significantly influenced dyadic behavior patterns. In protected intersections, interactions exhibited an "actor-only" pattern, where neither driver nor pedestrian wait times were significantly influenced by the partner’s velocity variability; behavior was independent. In designated crossings, a significant partner effect was observed from the pedestrian to the driver, meaning pedestrian velocity variability affected driver wait times, but not vice versa. In undesignated crossings, a "couple-oriented" pattern emerged, with significant partner effects in both directions, indicating strong mutual interdependence. Additionally, environmental factors like left-turn maneuvers and lead vehicle presence significantly impacted wait times in specific contexts. The findings suggest that roadway infrastructure mediates the necessity for negotiation between drivers and pedestrians. As protection increases, the reliance on implicit kinematic communication decreases. These insights are critical for designing automated systems that can appropriately encode human behavior, ensuring that autonomous vehicles interact safely and socially by adapting their signaling and decision-making based on the specific context of the intersection.

Key finding

Driver-pedestrian behavioral interdependence decreases as the level of intersection protection increases, with undesignated crossings showing mutual interdependence and protected crossings showing independent actor-only behaviors.

Methodology

naturalistic

Sample size: 228

Provenance

The full processing record for this entry. Every stage of this paper's journey through the pipeline is logged — what ran, with which tool and model, how many attempts it took, and when it last completed.

StageOutcomeToolModelPromptAttemptsCompleted
discover success Crossref 1 2026-06-06
archive success canonical_url 1 2026-06-06
extract success cached 3 2026-06-10
clean success clean 1 2026-06-07
chunk success chunk 1 2026-06-07
embed success embed Qwen/Qwen3-Embedding-8B 1 2026-06-07
enrich success semantic_scholar 1 2026-06-06
promote success 1 2026-06-06
summarize success llm qwen3.6-27b-prismaquant summ-v5 2 2026-06-10
tag success vector_similarity 15 2026-06-11
verify success 2 2026-06-10

Summary generated by qwen3.6-27b-prismaquant on 2026-06-10; verification: verified.

Topics

Ranked by relevance to this paper. Hover a topic for its definition.

Information type

What kind of knowledge this paper contributes, grouped by family — independent of topic (what it is about) and method (how it was studied).