Analysis of a Driving Simulator’s Steering System for the Evaluation of Autonomous Vehicle Driving
DOI: 10.3390/s25206471
archive: archived pipeline: cataloged
Get this paper ↗ (DOI — opens at the source; we link to it, we don't host it)
Summary
This paper addresses the need for robust experimental tools to evaluate human–machine interaction in autonomous vehicles (AVs), specifically focusing on the calibration and validation of the EVACH driving simulator for SAE Level 2 and Level 3 driving modes. The motivation stems from the critical safety implications of system disengagements, where drivers must rapidly regain control, often while engaged in non-driving-related tasks. The study aims to demonstrate that the EVACH simulator, a fixed-base, in-car platform, can faithfully reproduce autonomous driving conditions in rural road scenarios, providing a safe and cost-effective environment for studying driver behavior during frequent mode transitions. The methodology involved customizing the EVACH simulator’s hardware and software to emulate AV behavior. The platform utilizes a 2007 Fiat Croma cabin equipped with a dedicated data acquisition system based on an STM32H743ZI microcontroller. Key components include a MAXON RE-40 electric motor with a planetary reducer for steering control, an HBM T20W torque sensor, and custom Hall effect sensors for pedal position and steering centering. A PID control algorithm programmed in C ensures the steering wheel follows the virtual trajectory in autonomous mode while providing realistic resistive torque feedback. Calibration tests were conducted using a Mecmesin force meter to verify braking force measurements against a load cell, and steering torque was validated against target values. To validate the virtual environment, comparative experiments were performed between naturalistic road tests and simulator-based autonomous driving. Five volunteers participated in a preliminary pilot test, driving a 30 km rural road section that included alternating zones of autonomous and manual driving. The results indicated high fidelity in the simulator’s primary controls. Calibration tests showed minor errors in brake and steering measurements, consistent with values observed in production vehicles. In the comparative validation, average speeds recorded in the simulation closely matched those from real-world naturalistic tests, with differences of less than 1 km/h and minimal standard deviation. These findings confirm that the EVACH simulator stably and faithfully reproduces autonomous driving conditions. The study concludes that the EVACH platform is a reliable tool for investigating driver behavior and human–machine interaction in SAE 2 and 3 scenarios. By enabling the simulation of repeated handovers between automated and manual modes, the simulator supports safe, versatile, and cost-effective experimentation, which is essential for ensuring the safe deployment of automated vehicles and understanding the cognitive workload associated with system disengagements.
Provenance
The full processing record for this entry. Every stage of this paper's journey through the pipeline is logged — what ran, with which tool and model, how many attempts it took, and when it last completed.
| Stage | Outcome | Tool | Model | Prompt | Attempts | Completed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| discover | success | OpenAlex-citations | — | — | 1 | 2026-06-17 |
| archive | success | openalex | — | — | 11 | 2026-08-09 |
| extract | success | cached | — | — | 5 | 2026-08-23 |
| clean | success | clean | — | — | 2 | 2026-08-10 |
| chunk | success | chunk | — | — | 2 | 2026-08-10 |
| embed | success | embed | Qwen/Qwen3-Embedding-8B | — | 2 | 2026-08-10 |
| promote | success | — | — | — | 1 | 2026-06-17 |
| summarize | success | llm | qwen3.8-27b-gittensor | summ-v5 | 3 | 2026-08-23 |
| tag | success | vector_similarity | — | — | 17 | 2026-08-11 |
| verify | success | — | — | — | 2 | 2026-08-09 |
Summary generated by qwen3.8-27b-gittensor on 2026-08-23; verification: pending re-verification.
Topics
Ranked by relevance to this paper. Hover a topic for its definition.
- simulator validity fidelity
- steering pattern
- simulator training transfer
- lane positioning
- situational awareness
- hands on hands off engagement
Information type
What kind of knowledge this paper contributes, grouped by family — independent of topic (what it is about) and method (how it was studied).
- Methodological Resource: tool software, validation psychometrics
- Theoretical Contribution: computational model