Competing for cognitive resources: Measuring workload in a time pressured dual-task environment.

Strayer, David L.; Heathcote, Andrew · 2018 ·

DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/qtu37

archive: archived pipeline: cataloged verified

Get this paper ↗ (DOI — opens at the source; we link to it, we don't host it)

Summary

This study investigates the cognitive mechanisms underlying workload measurement using the Detection Response Task (DRT), an international standard for assessing mental load. While the DRT is widely used because it minimally impacts primary task performance, it remains unclear whether degraded DRT performance reflects a genuine reallocation of cognitive resources to the primary task or alternative processes such as changes in response caution or bias. The authors address this by modeling both a primary classification task and the DRT in a time-pressured dual-task environment to determine exactly what the DRT measures. The experiment involved 66 participants divided into single-task and dual-task groups. Participants performed a maritime surveillance task requiring them to classify ships as targets or non-targets under varying levels of time pressure, manipulated by changing the number of ships (2–4) and the deadline for classification (6–12 seconds). The dual-task group concurrently performed a tactile DRT, responding to vibrotactile stimuli presented randomly every 3–5 seconds. The researchers applied two evidence accumulation models—the Linear Ballistic Accumulator (LBA) and the single-bound diffusion (Wald) model—to analyze response times and accuracy for both tasks. This modeling approach allowed for the separation of latent cognitive processes, including the rate of information processing, response threshold (caution), and non-decision times. The results demonstrated that increased time pressure on the primary task led to a speed-accuracy tradeoff, with participants prioritizing speed and compromising accuracy, particularly for target stimuli. Crucially, the modeling revealed distinct changes in cognitive processes for each task. Under greater time pressure, the rate of information processing for the primary classification task increased, while response caution decreased. In contrast, the rate of information processing for the DRT declined significantly as primary task demands increased. These findings support the resource competition hypothesis, indicating that the DRT’s sensitivity to workload is driven by the reallocation of cognitive resources away from the secondary task and toward the primary task to maintain performance. The significance of this work lies in validating the theoretical basis of the DRT as a workload measure. By demonstrating that DRT performance decrements are specifically linked to a reduction in the rate of evidence accumulation due to resource reallocation, rather than merely changes in response strategy, the study confirms the DRT’s utility in safety-critical environments. This provides a direct test of resource models in dual-task paradigms, offering a more precise understanding of how individuals manage cognitive load and ensuring that workload assessments accurately reflect the competition for limited processing capacity.

Key finding

Under greater time pressure, the rate of information processing increased on the primary task while response caution decreased, whereas the rate of information processing in the DRT declined, confirming that DRT performance decrements result from the reallocation of cognitive resources to the primary task.

Methodology

lab_experiment

Sample size: 66

Provenance

The full processing record for this entry. Every stage of this paper's journey through the pipeline is logged — what ran, with which tool and model, how many attempts it took, and when it last completed. Discovered via unpaywall on 2026-05-07 (9 acquisition events logged).

StageOutcomeToolModelPromptAttemptsCompleted
discover success author_sweep 2 2026-05-28
archive success 3 2026-05-28
extract success cached 2 2026-06-10
clean success 1 2026-06-01
chunk success 1 2026-06-01
embed success 1 2026-06-02
enrich success openalex 2 2026-05-08
promote success 1 2026-05-07
summarize success llm qwen3.6-27b-prismaquant summ-v5 3 2026-06-10
tag success vector_similarity 18 2026-06-11
verify success 2 2026-06-10

Summary generated by qwen3.6-27b-prismaquant on 2026-06-10; verification: verified.

Topics

Ranked by relevance to this paper. Hover a topic for its definition.

Information type

What kind of knowledge this paper contributes, grouped by family — independent of topic (what it is about) and method (how it was studied).