Driver Reactions to Automated Vehicles

Eriksson, Alexander; Stanton, Neville A. · 2018 · Crossref

DOI: 10.1201/9781351207515

archive: archived pipeline: cataloged verified

Get this paper ↗ (DOI — opens at the source; we link to it, we don't host it)

Summary

This book, *Driver Reactions to Automated Vehicles*, addresses the critical human factors challenges associated with highly automated driving systems, specifically focusing on the transition of control between the driver and the vehicle. The research is motivated by the rapid commercialization of automation technologies (e.g., Tesla Autopilot, Audi Traffic Jam Pilot) which, while offering convenience, require drivers to remain attentive and ready to resume control when the system encounters limitations or failures. The authors aim to provide a practical guide for designing and evaluating these interactions, addressing the gap between marketing claims and the operational reality where drivers must act as fallbacks. The study employs a mixed-methods approach, combining theoretical analysis with empirical data from driving simulators and on-road tests. The authors developed custom software algorithms to replicate longitudinal and lateral automation in simulators, allowing for controlled experimentation. Key experiments included simulator-based studies on take-over times and driving stability, as well as one of the few on-road studies conducted on the M40 motorway in the UK using a Tesla Model S equipped with Autopilot. Additionally, the book utilizes a linguistics approach to assess human-automation interaction, drawing lessons from aviation case studies (Air France 447 and ComAir 3272) to understand communication failures. The research also evaluates novel human-machine interfaces, specifically augmented reality guidance, to support tactical decision-making during control transitions. The findings reveal that handover times in non-emergency situations are significantly longer than previously reported in literature, and the handover from driver to vehicle is often under-reported. Crucially, the study found high correlation between handover times in simulators and on-road conditions, with drivers averaging about one second quicker on the open road, thereby validating the use of simulators for this research. Self-paced handovers from vehicle to driver resulted in greater driving stability compared to emergency handovers. Furthermore, interfaces that allowed drivers to plan ahead and supported tactical-level decision-making demonstrated superior performance in terms of success rates and reduced workload. The significance of this work lies in its contribution to both theoretical understanding and practical design of automated vehicles. It highlights the complexity of reintegrating the human driver into the control loop and underscores the necessity of effective communication between the automation and the user. The authors conclude that while vehicle automation is already present, significant issues regarding handover design and driver monitoring remain unresolved. The book provides engineers and researchers with validated methods for assessing performance and designing interfaces that mitigate the risks associated with control transitions, emphasizing that much work is required before automation can become commonplace and safe.

Provenance

The full processing record for this entry. Every stage of this paper's journey through the pipeline is logged — what ran, with which tool and model, how many attempts it took, and when it last completed.

StageOutcomeToolModelPromptAttemptsCompleted
discover success Crossref 1 2026-06-18
archive success canonical_url 1 2026-06-25
extract success cached 2 2026-06-26
clean success clean 1 2026-06-20
chunk success chunk 1 2026-06-20
embed success embed Qwen/Qwen3-Embedding-8B 1 2026-06-20
enrich success openalex 1 2026-06-20
promote success 1 2026-06-18
summarize success llm qwen3.6-27b-prismaquant summ-v5 1 2026-06-26
tag success vector_similarity 6 2026-06-20
verify partial 1 2026-06-26

Summary generated by qwen3.6-27b-prismaquant on 2026-06-26; verification: verified_with_issues.

Topics

Ranked by relevance to this paper. Hover a topic for its definition.

Information type

What kind of knowledge this paper contributes, grouped by family — independent of topic (what it is about) and method (how it was studied).