Cocktail Party Effect& Attention Capture in Semi-Autonomous Driving

Tobias, Crystal; Su, Chen-Yung; Kolburg, Lutz; Lathrop, Brian · 2013 · Crossref

DOI: 10.17077/drivingassessment.1528

archive: archived pipeline: cataloged verified

Get this paper ↗ (DOI — opens at the source; we link to it, we don't host it)

Summary

This pilot study investigates the efficacy of using a driver’s personal name as an auditory warning cue to capture attention in semi-autonomous driving scenarios, leveraging the psychological phenomenon known as the "cocktail party effect." The research addresses the safety hazard of driver distraction, where operators of semi-autonomous vehicles may become "out of the loop" by engaging in secondary tasks, thereby losing situational awareness. The authors hypothesized that a personally significant semantic cue (one’s name) would capture attention more effectively and rapidly than a standard warning tone, particularly when drivers are deeply distracted during automated driving modes. The study employed a mixed experimental design with 60 participants driving a high-fidelity simulator under both manual and semi-autonomous conditions. While driving, participants performed a cognitively demanding secondary task involving the input of spoken number sequences. An emergency situation was simulated by the sudden appearance of a lead vehicle, accompanied by either a standard warning tone or the participant’s personal name, delivered via text-to-speech software. The researchers measured reaction times for eye disengagement, steering, and braking, as well as secondary task accuracy and subjective workload using the NASA-TLX questionnaire. Results indicated that driving mode significantly impacted reaction times, with participants reacting slower in semi-autonomous mode compared to manual mode, particularly during the first warning event. While there was no significant main effect for cue type overall, a marginally significant interaction effect suggested that the personal name cue yielded faster reaction times than the tone cue specifically within the semi-autonomous condition. Subjective data revealed that both cues were perceived as warnings, but the personal name received high acceptance rates, with 77% of participants expressing interest in such a system for their own vehicles. Additionally, participants demonstrated higher engagement and better performance on the secondary task during semi-autonomous driving, confirming the increased distraction level in that mode. The findings suggest that while semi-autonomous driving leads to delayed responses due to diverted attention, the use of a personal name shows promise as an effective mechanism for recapturing driver focus. The study concludes that personal names warrant further investigation as attention-capturing cues, potentially offering advantages over standard tones in automated driving contexts. Future research is recommended to explore within-subjects designs, compare names against other semantic instructions, and test combined multimodal cues to optimize driver safety systems.

Provenance

The full processing record for this entry. Every stage of this paper's journey through the pipeline is logged — what ran, with which tool and model, how many attempts it took, and when it last completed.

Summary generated by qwen3.6-27b-prismaquant on 2026-06-26; verification: verified.

Topics

Ranked by relevance to this paper. Hover a topic for its definition.

• auditory
• temporal
• distraction detection algorithms
• cognitive
• manual
• visual

Information type

What kind of knowledge this paper contributes, grouped by family — independent of topic (what it is about) and method (how it was studied).

• Empirical Findings: behavioral performance data
• Theoretical Contribution: conceptual framework, theory or model