Driver distraction

Neyens, David Michael · 2018 · Crossref

DOI: 10.17077/etd.3wbiwx3c

archive: archived pipeline: cataloged verified

Get this paper ↗ (DOI — opens at the source; we link to it, we don't host it)

Summary

This dissertation investigates the impact of driver distraction on individuals with traumatic brain injuries (TBIs), a population characterized by cognitive impairments such as reduced concentration, memory loss, and impulsivity. With approximately 1.4 million TBIs occurring annually in the United States, many of which result from transportation crashes, understanding the safety risks for TBI survivors who resume driving is critical. The research addresses a gap in literature regarding how the competing demands of distraction interact with TBI-related cognitive deficits. The study aims to determine if crash characteristics differ for TBI drivers, evaluate their willingness to engage in distracting activities, and assess how specific distracting tasks affect driving performance compared to non-TBI drivers. The research employed a multi-method approach utilizing crash data, a TBI registry, a survey of TBI drivers, and an on-road driving study. For the crash analysis, Iowa crash data was linked to the Iowa Brain Injury Registry in a case-control design to compare crashes involving TBI survivors against matched controls. A survey assessed TBI drivers’ willingness to engage in non-driving activities, clustering respondents into "Engagers" and "Avoiders." To evaluate driving performance, an on-road study compared TBI drivers with healthy controls while they performed three distracting tasks: radio tuning, CD selection, and coin sorting. The coin sorting task included an additional cognitive component (counting currency). A Bayesian statistical approach was used to analyze the on-road data, with prior distributions derived from a simulator study of non-TBI drivers. The findings reveal that TBI drivers involved in crashes were less likely to wear seatbelts and more likely to be involved in multiple crashes compared to other drivers. Survey results indicated that a subset of TBI drivers, termed "Engagers," were more willing to engage in distracting tasks and had a higher likelihood of receiving speeding tickets post-injury. In the on-road study, TBI drivers exhibited worse driving performance during the coin sorting task than non-TBI drivers, evidenced by higher standard deviation of speed and maximum lateral acceleration. This suggests that the cognitive component of the task disproportionately affected TBI drivers. Across all tasks, TBI drivers spent a larger percentage of time looking at the distraction and executed more glances toward the task than healthy controls. The study concludes that driver distractions involving cognitive components are particularly problematic for individuals with TBIs, likely exacerbating existing cognitive deficits. The results highlight that TBI drivers may exhibit increased risk-taking behaviors and poorer vehicle control when distracted. These findings imply that current assessments of driving fitness for TBI survivors may need to account for distraction tolerance. Future research is recommended to validate these effects across more complex cognitive tasks, such as cell phone usage, and to further investigate the high rate of repeat crashes among this population.

Provenance

The full processing record for this entry. Every stage of this paper's journey through the pipeline is logged — what ran, with which tool and model, how many attempts it took, and when it last completed.

StageOutcomeToolModelPromptAttemptsCompleted
discover success Crossref 1 2026-06-07
archive success canonical_url 7 2026-06-09
extract success cached 2 2026-06-10
clean success clean 1 2026-06-09
chunk success chunk 1 2026-06-09
embed success embed Qwen/Qwen3-Embedding-8B 1 2026-06-09
enrich failed 3 2026-07-02
promote success 1 2026-06-07
summarize success llm qwen3.6-27b-prismaquant summ-v5 1 2026-06-10
tag success vector_similarity 8 2026-06-11
verify success 1 2026-06-10

Summary generated by qwen3.6-27b-prismaquant on 2026-06-10; verification: verified.

Topics

Ranked by relevance to this paper. Hover a topic for its definition.

Information type

What kind of knowledge this paper contributes, grouped by family — independent of topic (what it is about) and method (how it was studied).