Effects of Control Transition Strategies and Human-Machine Interface Designs on Driver Performance in Automated Driving Systems

Leung, Chokiu; Zhou, Huiping; Itoh, Makoto; Kitazaki, Satoshi · 2024 · Crossref

DOI: 10.20485/jsaeijae.15.1_36

archive: archived pipeline: cataloged verified

Get this paper ↗ (DOI — opens at the source; we link to it, we don't host it)

Summary

This study investigates the impact of control transition strategies and Human-Machine Interface (HMI) designs on driver performance in Level 3 (L3) automated driving systems. The research addresses the "Out of the Loop" phenomenon, where drivers disengaged in non-driving related tasks struggle to regain control during sudden Requests to Intervene (RtI). To mitigate this, the authors propose an Adaptive Control Transition (ACT) strategy, which gradually shifts automation levels (L3 to L2/L1 to L0) based on environmental conditions, contrasting it with a Fixed Control Transition (FCT) strategy that shifts directly from L3 to L0. The study further examines two HMI design perspectives: Explicit-HMI, which provides human-centered instructions on specific driver actions, and Implicit-HMI, which offers system-centered notifications of state changes. The experiment utilized a driving simulator with 60 licensed drivers aged 22–67, divided into four between-subjects conditions combining the two strategies and two HMI designs. Participants engaged in non-driving tasks while the system navigated highway scenarios involving degraded conditions such as fog, blurred lane markings, and road construction. The ACT strategy triggered intermediate transitions (e.g., L3 to L2) to prompt monitoring before full manual takeover, whereas the FCT group received no intermediate warnings. Researchers measured driver awareness by counting inappropriate actions during L3-to-L2/L1 transitions and assessed reaction times during final L3-to-L0 takeovers. Results indicated that Explicit-HMI significantly reduced inappropriate driver actions compared to Implicit-HMI during intermediate transitions, demonstrating that explicit instructions better sustain driver awareness of their changing roles. Regarding reaction times, the ACT strategy facilitated earlier responses during L3-to-L0 transitions compared to FCT. By providing initial guidance to monitor the environment, ACT allowed drivers to process traffic conditions progressively, resulting in faster and more appropriate takeovers when full manual control was required. The study concludes that combining adaptive automation with explicit, human-centered HMI designs effectively enhances driver situational awareness and improves safety during control transitions in automated vehicles.

Provenance

The full processing record for this entry. Every stage of this paper's journey through the pipeline is logged — what ran, with which tool and model, how many attempts it took, and when it last completed.

StageOutcomeToolModelPromptAttemptsCompleted
discover success Crossref 1 2026-08-09
archive success canonical_url 1 2026-08-09
extract success cached 3 2026-08-10
clean success clean 1 2026-08-09
chunk success chunk 1 2026-08-09
embed success embed Qwen/Qwen3-Embedding-8B 1 2026-08-09
enrich failed 1 2026-08-09
promote success 1 2026-08-09
summarize success llm qwen3.6-27b-nvidia summ-v5 2 2026-08-10
tag success vector_similarity 10 2026-08-11
verify partial 2 2026-08-10

Summary generated by qwen3.6-27b-nvidia on 2026-08-10; verification: verified_with_issues.

Topics

Ranked by relevance to this paper. Hover a topic for its definition.

Information type

What kind of knowledge this paper contributes, grouped by family — independent of topic (what it is about) and method (how it was studied).